AssemblyBoard

General Discussion => Any and All Topics => : Accurate February 06, 2003, 02:02:38 AM



: 100% accurate
: Accurate February 06, 2003, 02:02:38 AM
Hey, is this website 100% accurate on all accounts of all things that have taken place over the past 30 years and even more recently?  or is it 75% accurate?  just wondering. you may have heard of fair and balanced reporting that some newspapers and others attempt...but we have not seen that here. So how much is here is unbalanced reporting? How much is truth, it is very hard to tell except for the facts of the letters that were written that are posted.  maybe this site should be renamed Rumorsofgeftakysassembly.com?
I know, I know, I must have been brainwashed and I am being forced to write this....or better yet, I am deceived so my view can not be correct . Hmm.


: Re:100% accurate
: editor February 06, 2003, 02:06:41 AM
Dear Accurate

Please tell us what is not Accurate.  We'll correct it.  That has always been my promise, and I have always made good on it.

Why don't you come out in the light, and tell us who you are and what you do?

If you prefer darkness, the Lord Jesus has something to say about that.

You give us one thing that is not accurate, and I'll correct it!  In fact, I'll make it front page news on the main website, and include a picture of me publicly apologizing for inaccuracy.

BTW,  when is your master going to apologize for his "inaccuracy," in the issue of his marriage vows?

Brent


: Re:100% accurate
: accurate February 06, 2003, 02:08:37 AM
dear BT
please tell what is accurate , or are you saying you are 100% accurate in all your assesments, history and accusations?


: Re:100% accurate
: editor February 06, 2003, 02:10:58 AM
Accurate

Yes, everything is accurate and is backed up by the testimony of many witnesses.  Furthermore, I have had the courage to post it in public, where it may bear scrutiny from sincere anonymous people like yourself.  

The burden of proof lies clearly on you.

Brent


: Re:100% accurate
: accurate February 06, 2003, 02:17:38 AM
OK. If you say so.   However, you just made an inaccurate and unverified claim in your post:

"BTW,  when is your master going to apologize for his "inaccuracy," in the issue of his marriage vows?"

Please tell me how you know who my master is, or are you drawing false conlusions based on inperfect information?


: Re:100% accurate
: Arthur February 06, 2003, 02:21:24 AM
<Sigh>  Instead of raising the question with a nebulous insinuation, declare the statements from posts that are false, and then state the correct facts. Thanks.
What you are doing - proffering subversive posts incognito - is pusillanimous.

Arthur


: Re:100% accurate
: accurate February 06, 2003, 02:24:54 AM
...but he has proved that what is posted and stated are not 100% accurate and thus difficult to tell when he is or isn't speaking the truth.  Very fancy words thought artur


: Re:100% accurate
: editor February 06, 2003, 02:25:36 AM
Dear Accurate

If you continue on in this silly manner, I will simply delete the thread.  You are impersonating someone, and their name is Accurate.

Brent


: Re:100% accurate
: accurate February 06, 2003, 02:26:58 AM
That's the way Brent. Take it out and prove my point.


: Re:100% accurate
: psalm51 February 06, 2003, 02:34:45 AM
That's the way Brent. Take it out and prove my point.
"accurate",
You've proven Brent's point every time you post anonymously. By all means point out the inaccuracies. It's happened before and Brent took care of it immediately. If you have nothing to say except that this site is not accurate and do not give any proofs then what's the point? It's like kids on the playground saying over and over, ad nauseum:"you did too", "did not", "did too". Please, if you want any credibility then produce something besides empty accusations.
Pat


: Re:100% accurate
: ps accurate February 06, 2003, 02:36:54 AM
..also, to tell me to come into the light is interesting. Why don't all the ones posting here come and directly address those they are accusing so boldly on this board? That burden lays upon you my friend.  Go an personally speak to each of these ones you are flaming you your board.  Oh, but can't do that, they are all deceived and walking in darkness.


: Re:100% accurate
: Ken Fuller February 06, 2003, 02:37:23 AM
Maybe he's saying Judy and Rachel are lying, were never abused -- David is a Godly compassionate man, George never committed adultery, and the money is completely accounted for??

Oh yeah -- and none of us have had our thinking influenced in anyway by a Godless fraud ......


: Re:100% accurate
: jesusfreak February 06, 2003, 02:37:49 AM
Accurate, who are your enemies?


: Re:100% accurate
: accurate February 06, 2003, 02:41:26 AM
Let us start with this letter then? Where are we with this now? Is this reconciliation?


January 19th, 2003

Brent and Suzie Tr0ckman

To: Fellowship in San Luis Obispo

RE: Repentance and Reconciliation

 

Dear friends:

I recognize that in my attempt to expose sin in the Geftakys ministry, I misused God’s Word by knitting the Truth therein, with my own sarcasm and bitterness. Because of this, many people were hurt and offended, which hindered whatever truth could have otherwise been communicated. I am repenting of this, and ask for your forgiveness.

Brent Tr0ckman

Suzie Tr0ckman


: Re:100% accurate
: psalm51 February 06, 2003, 02:48:43 AM
..also, to tell me to come into the light is interesting. Why don't all the ones posting here come and directly address those they are accusing so boldly on this board? That burden lays upon you my friend.  Go an personally speak to each of these ones you are flaming you your board.  Oh, but can't do that, they are all deceived and walking in darkness.
Perhaps you do not realize that many, if not all,  of the people spoken of on this board have been contacted. (It's likely that George and Betty aren't answering phone calls right now) Just because it is not on this website, doesn't mean that things aren't happening in that regard. Lay down your weapons or be more specific.


: Re:100% accurate
: accurate February 06, 2003, 02:56:21 AM
ummm, I thought my last post was pretty specific., additionally, GG is not who I am talking about .... it is the many other names I have seen thrown about in this BB.


: Re:100% accurate
: editor February 06, 2003, 02:59:23 AM
Dear Accurate

You quote my letter, which has been viewed over a thousand times.  What about it is not accurate?

Brent


: Re:100% accurate
: Toni Fuller February 06, 2003, 03:11:38 AM
Accurate,  enough already!!!  If you have a bone to pick with someone then get on with it.  If you see something you think is wrong, like Pat & Brent both stated...pls. point it out.  If you haven't the foggiest idea what you're talking about and are just trynig to stir up trouble...then go away!!! Many of us here do know each other, & or their parents. etc.


: 110% accurate...I pity the foo!
: freebird February 06, 2003, 05:25:39 AM
Mr. T is getting ready to come back to the BB! :o


: Re:100% accurate
: Guest February 06, 2003, 07:11:59 PM
Dear accurate,

It is neither by this website, nor by yours or my efforts , will the work of God stand or fall.
Gamaliel said Acts 5:38b-39 "And so in the present case, ... if this plan or action should be of men, it will be overthrown; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them; or else you may even be found fighting against God."

Every work of God will be tested:
Heb 12:27 And this expression, "Yet once more," denotes the removing of those things which can be shaken, as of created things, in order that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.

If your faith is built upon the Rock, then it will not fail when the winds and the waves and the torrents burst upon it.


: Re:100% accurate
: accurate??? February 06, 2003, 07:17:14 PM
The part about your reconcilliation and repentance....

Dear Accurate

You quote my letter, which has been viewed over a thousand times.  What about it is not accurate?

Brent


: Re:100% accurate
: accurate? February 06, 2003, 07:19:19 PM
dear guest,
the church will always exist until the Lord returns, that which is being shaken (in this case) are those who have put their faith in men and not God.
Dear accurate,

It is neither by this website, nor by yours or my efforts , will the work of God stand or fall.
Gamaliel said Acts 5:38b-39 "And so in the present case, ... if this plan or action should be of men, it will be overthrown; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them; or else you may even be found fighting against God."

Every work of God will be tested:
Heb 12:27 And this expression, "Yet once more," denotes the removing of those things which can be shaken, as of created things, in order that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.

If your faith is built upon the Rock, then it will not fail when the winds and the waves and the torrents burst upon it.


: Re:100% accurate
: accurate?? February 06, 2003, 07:31:20 PM
dear guest #2...interesting that you would quote that verse..was Gamaliel a Christian? Also, what are you inferring? That all the good that has been done through this ministry is now not of God because the failure of man? If that was the case, please read 1 Cor. How did Paul address that assembly who was clearly carnal? Did he disregard all that had taken place there? No, but encouraged them to deal with the issues (which they did) and get a turning and repentance. He then encourages them to Love ...as many have discussed on this board, but seem unable to do so toward those who believe that what we are involved in in our local gatherings, is of the Lord.


Dear accurate,

It is neither by this website, nor by yours or my efforts , will the work of God stand or fall.
Gamaliel said Acts 5:38b-39 "And so in the present case, ... if this plan or action should be of men, it will be overthrown; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them; or else you may even be found fighting against God."

Every work of God will be tested:
Heb 12:27 And this expression, "Yet once more," denotes the removing of those things which can be shaken, as of created things, in order that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.

If your faith is built upon the Rock, then it will not fail when the winds and the waves and the torrents burst upon it.


: Re:100% accurate
: Guest February 06, 2003, 07:58:42 PM
I am not inferring what you suggested.  BTW I am still in fellowship.  I agree with you regarding 1Cor.  However, it seems that you are incencensed by this BB, so the comments were for you personally. (Don't worry, be happy (just joking)).


: Re:100% accurate
: editor February 06, 2003, 08:17:12 PM
Dear Accurate, guest, and other anonymous posters

Very soon I am going to be announcing a new B policy.  Threads like this one, that are pointless and hollow, will still be allowed on one part of the BB.  Another part, where only serious discussion will take place, will be off limits to anyone who is not registered, and who does not use their real name.

The posts in the serious section, that are of a foolish nature, such as this thread, will be deleted or moved to the "open" section.

Accurate, you are a total loser.

Brent Tr0ckman  (my real name)


Sorry, the copyright must be in the template.
Please notify this forum's administrator that this site is missing the copyright message for SMF so they can rectify the situation. Display of copyright is a legal requirement. For more information on this please visit the Simple Machines website.