: George is Innocent : editor March 01, 2004, 12:12:17 AM Please read this:
http://www.soaringwiththeeagles.com/yabbse/index.php?board=6;action=display;threadid=159;start=0#msg498 (http://www.soaringwiththeeagles.com/yabbse/index.php?board=6;action=display;threadid=159;start=0#msg498) I must say, the only evidence against George comes from a vague letter read by the Fullerton leaders, who then discredited themselves by stepping down. History, and plenty of firsthand testimony suggests that they are unreliable witnesses. The man who I have accused, and possibly slandered and libeled, has maintained his innocence from day one. He says that it never happened, and that the one thing that did happen, was years ago and that he had made it right then. He also claims that the Fullerton leaders wanted to take over his ministry and trumped up charges against him in order to do just that. He has called his son Timothy, "Absalom." Timothy is regaining his stature among what is left of his father's ministry. The Assemblies are regrouping, and at present, there is no evidence to substantiate any of the claims made against George. No one has come forward, other than unreliable, disloyal ex-followers of George. What they have come forward with is the vaguest of suggestions. There is absolutely no proof to back it up. However, it does appear that their motive was indeed to boot George, and take over his ministry. Afterall, that is exactly what several of them have done. I have been a fool caught up in my own folly in this whole affair. The facts regarding David Geftakys, although bad, were no reason to destroy a man's ministry, and set adrift and offend those under his care. In my foolishness, I painted George as an evil man, based on incomplete testimony, which may not have any factual basis to it at all. Should I be accused of slander, I would have a shakey case indeed. Would these women be willing to tell their story in order to get me off the hook? Probably not....they may not even exist. Certainly, they don't want to talk. For these reasons, I must say that I am ashamed about every bit of the website that has to do with George's adultery. None of it is true, and he has a very solid denial and explanation for why people would do this to him. For all we know, these women made advances toward him and he rebuffed them! There isn't a single shred of evidence to the contrary, except a vauge suggestion in a short letter of excommunication. The Fullerton leadership could very well have made it up. Certainly they had motive to do so. Certainly we all know they made up similiar stories to slander other people over the years. What is to stop them from doing this to George? You can't trust them. The Assemblies still meeting, especially those still sympathetic to George are to be commended for their courage. They are seeing things correctly. There is no evidence that anything ever happened, and certainly the matter was handled improperly. They have maintained this all along, and have said that the website is mostly lies......and you know what? They are correct on every count. Accusations that cannot be substantiated are just plain wrong. George never committed sexual sin with anyone. No one can prove that he did, and the women he allegedly had "improper sexaul contact," with either do not exist, or won't say anything. Sure, there may be some people who know better, but the vast majortiy of people have nothing more to go on than a vague suggestion in a short letter written by men who lack credibility. I am ashamed for what I have done. Please pray for me, that I will use wisdom in righting the wrongs that I am able to correct in this matter. I really have no proof that I can share to back up much of what I have said regarding George's alleged sexual impropriety, therefore, I must remove things, and correct things, and apologize to George and plenty of others. Unlike the unreliable, disloyal men in Fullerton, who pulled off what appears to be a palace coup, I am going to admit my mistakes. We can't believe anything the Fullerton leaders say, and the women they allegedly spoke to either don't exist, or won't back up a word of what they may or may not have said against George to unreliable, disloyal people. The whole thing stinks, and I am ashamed for my part in it. Brent : Re:George is Innocent : DavidHaan March 01, 2004, 04:35:05 AM Brent,
Why do you move the blame from george to the leadership in fullerton? are you going apologize to us _next_ year for _falsely_ accusing the leadership? do you have any evidence supporting your accusations against the fullerton leadership? david ps. why did it take you an entire year and thousands of posts to realize you didn't have any proof? : Re:George is Innocent : Kimberley Tobin March 01, 2004, 04:57:30 AM Brent,
I don't know why you're doing what you're doing, I can only surmise. But, I for one, think it is ridiculous. Having trusted you and gone to the link, I am now upset and irritated. This is why in the past I have refused to read what Sondra and Matt have to say, as it just irritates me and raises my blood pressure. I was addressed on the "soaring with seagulls" BB just prior to your post and I refuse to respond to their ridiculous responses. I hope this accomplishes your intended purpose. : Re:George is Innocent : jesusfreak March 01, 2004, 05:06:10 AM Brent
Are you joking when you label an "abusive culture" as a "small thing"? GG's actions never have and never will be a reason for my departure from the Assembly system, nor should the actions of another sinful entity be anyone's. I should note, I am quite impressed by your realization regarding fairness of judgment where proof is not available. Indeed, it does not fall upon the accused to prove innocence. -- lucas : Re:George is Innocent : editor March 01, 2004, 06:08:09 AM Brent Are you joking when you label an "abusive culture" as a "small thing"? GG's actions never have and never will be a reason for my departure from the Assembly system, nor should the actions of another sinful entity be anyone's. I should note, I am quite impressed by your realization regarding fairness of judgment where proof is not available. Indeed, it does not fall upon the accused to prove innocence. -- lucas I'll respond to both Lucas and Kimberley with this one. I think abuse is relative. The control and brainwashing is a small thing, compared to the alleged sexual impropriety, because the level of control and abuse in order to pull that off made the pressure to go on outreach quite trivial. Dear Kimberley, you know me better than to think that I am doing something ridiculous. I won't argue with you about any merit in Matt's posts, but I do believe that he hit the nail on the head with the one I linked to. We all know what happened. I know that women came forward and spoke to a number of people and were able to convince them that real abuse took place. There is no doubt in my mind about what happened. However, can I prove this? If Matt says to me, "How do you know it is true, Brent. Where are the women, do they exist?" I can't answer him without divulging their identity against their will. Furthermore, they don't talk. No witnesses, no crime. And to Dave Haan: I didn't accuse the fullerton leadership at all. I merely stated fact. If you haven't figured it out, I haven't changed my stance one bit on any of this. The only thing I came to realize is that I can't prove any of it, if forced to do so, because the only ones who really know what happened won't say anything. The door is wide open for George and anyone else to spin this in any manner they see fit and no one can stop them. They have the green light to do whatever they want and nobody can stop them....except for those that know what really happened. Why should I make a stand when I have no one to back me up? Brent : Re:George is Innocent : jesusfreak March 01, 2004, 09:26:38 AM I think abuse is relative. The control and brainwashing is a small thing, compared to the alleged sexual impropriety, because the level of control and abuse in order to pull that off made the pressure to go on outreach quite trivial. Indeed, I do not seek to compare my "suffering" from "abuse" with that of these women; they are on 2 completely different levels. However, when the "abuse" I endured is solely defined by the social culture inherent to the assemblies, possessing no relation to the immorality of this single Man, it becomes an enormously big deal. I should also note, my experiences are not in the least limited to "being forced onto outreach". This is quite an offensive trivialization. Anyway, I know that it was not your intent in the least to portray your comment in this way, and I am not offended in the least ;). However, please understand that not everyone has the same vested interest in GG's infidelity. I, for one, while I sympathize with those women and the unfair hardship they should never have endured, am completely unable to relate to them on more than that level. As a result, the fact as to whether or not GG did or did not have sexual relations with them means little to my choice in departing the assembly. I suppose the only reason I said anything was to point out that there are more important issues than a single man's actions. And that it should have been these issues that spurned departure..........would you still wish to be involved if GG is truly innocent? -- lucas : Re:George is Innocent : moonflower2 March 01, 2004, 10:24:16 AM I suppose the only reason I said anything was to point out that there are more important issues than a single man's actions. lucas Lucas, The man behind the instrument of all the abuse in the system was a man with flawed character. Everyone was influenced by him in every aspect of their lives, whether to abuse or be abused. His alleged infidelity shows that he was not living what he preached to all of us. George and his behavior are the root of all the wrongs in the assemblies. His alleged abuse of women in the assembly is glaring proof of the phony he was. : Re:George is Innocent : jesusfreak March 01, 2004, 10:39:05 AM I suppose the only reason I said anything was to point out that there are more important issues than a single man's actions. lucas Lucas, The man behind the instrument of all the abuse in the system was a man with flawed character. Everyone was influenced by him in every aspect of their lives, whether to abuse or be abused. His alleged infidelity shows that he was not living what he preached to all of us. George and his behavior are the root of all the wrongs in the assemblies. His alleged abuse of women in the assembly is glaring proof of the phony he was. Regardless of his personal interaction with the elements that drove me away, it was still the elements and not GG. I am not claiming that just because he might not have done the sexual deeds he is accused of that he is not a bad guy, heaven forbid. I have only stated that these elements exist and are important, GG's actions involving these women posing little relevance in this light. If you choose to use his possible infidelity as a spearhead concerning the source of these elements, that is your prerogative. It does not, however, diminish the fact that it was *not* GG who directly affected me while in the assembly. (hi!, btw ;)) -- lucas : Re:George is Innocent : moonflower2 March 01, 2004, 06:24:04 PM I suppose the only reason I said anything was to point out that there are more important issues than a single man's actions. lucas Lucas, The man behind the instrument of all the abuse in the system was a man with flawed character. Everyone was influenced by him in every aspect of their lives, whether to abuse or be abused. His alleged infidelity shows that he was not living what he preached to all of us. George and his behavior are the root of the wrongs in the assemblies. His alleged abuse of women in the assembly is glaring proof of the phony he was. Regardless of his personal interaction with the elements that drove me away, it was still the elements and not GG. I am not claiming that just because he might not have done the sexual deeds he is accused of that he is not a bad guy, heaven forbid. I have only stated that these elements exist and are important, GG's actions involving these women posing little relevance in this light. If you choose to use his possible infidelity as a spearhead concerning the source of these elements, that is your prerogative. It does not, however, diminish the fact that it was *not* GG who directly affected me while in the assembly. (hi!, btw ;)) -- lucas Hi Lucas, I believe that GG's warped life was behind all of the negative elements that drove most people away. Everyone was affected by him. It influenced the way we looked at and treated ourselves and eachother. He was allegedly cheating on his wife, robbing us, and allowing his son to abuse his daughter-in-law. It affected everyone. Unless your issues were with the wooden chairs we had to sit on, you were affected by this man's life and how he treated people. :( : Re:George is Innocent : Joe Sperling March 01, 2004, 09:52:30 PM Brent said below "Please read this": and I clicked on the hyperlink without even thinking first. I realized seconds later that I had been taken to a thread on the SWTE website which I have avoided since I made a commitment to do so a couple of months ago.
I read a couple of paragraphs of the post and was immediately reminded of why I have avoided this website. I backed out right away, after being blasted with a familiar hissing sound I had heard before when I used to visit there. Brent---I appreciate your post, and as always your sarcasm and wittiness, but I swear from the bottom of my heart that even responding to the nonsense that was stated, and leading others through a hyperlink to that place is detrimental, and a pure waste of time. This is just my opinion I know, but I give it in all honesty. It is far better to avoid that BB than to comment on anything that is stated there. It seems that everything posted there leads to disunity and accusation. I, for one, want to continue to avoid that place, and regret clicking on the hyperlink that led me there today. I understand why you would want to respond to it though Brent, and as always appreciate your comments. The truth will always remian the truth though, no matter how much a couple of people want to warp it, or twist it. ---Joe : Re:George is Innocent : jesusfreak March 01, 2004, 10:36:39 PM Hi Lucas, I dunno....I am sure those chairs went through GG's reproof as well.... ;)I believe that GG's warped life was behind all of the negative elements that drove most people away. Everyone was affected by him. It influenced the way we looked at and treated ourselves and eachother. He was allegedly cheating on his wife, robbing us, and allowing his son to abuse his daughter-in-law. It affected everyone. Unless your issues were with the wooden chairs we had to sit on, you were affected by this man's life and how he treated people. :( More seriously: Sure, this is quite possibly true. However, as I had no interaction with the man, there obviously must have been *something else* that was directly affecting me. I may not dispute the argument that GG might have been *behind* all the problems with the assembly, but that does not mean that he was the sole problem. Anyway, as you have listed other issues GG is possible for (robbing, relations to David, ect), you understand that the issue of his infidelity is a rather redundant one when labeling him as a problem of the assembly system (since he has been pointed out time and time again). Obviously, I am speaking from my perspective here and do not wish to trivialize the hardship faced by any woman in reference to sexual relations with GG, but GG is simply not a big deal to me in the least. Perhaps I choose to condemn the system rather than the people responsible for it? One is a matter of discernment, the other a matter of judgment..... -- lucas : Re:George is Innocent : moonflower2 March 01, 2004, 11:01:30 PM More seriously: Sure, this is quite possibly true. However, as I had no interaction with the man, there obviously must have been *something else* that was directly affecting me. I may not dispute the argument that GG might have been *behind* all the problems with the assembly, but that does not mean that he was the sole problem. Anyway, as you have listed other issues GG is possible for (robbing, relations to David, ect), you understand that the issue of his infidelity is a rather redundant one when labeling him as a problem of the assembly system (since he has been pointed out time and time again). Obviously, I am speaking from my perspective here and do not wish to trivialize the hardship faced by any woman in reference to sexual relations with GG, but GG is simply not a big deal to me in the least. Perhaps I choose to condemn the system rather than the people responsible for it? One is a matter of discernment, the other a matter of judgment..... -- lucas Well, I hope you aren't saying that I'm judging George the same way you are judging the "system". :o ;) ;D ;D Moonflower2 : Re:George is Innocent : delila March 02, 2004, 09:52:15 PM Brent said below "Please read this": and I clicked on the hyperlink without even thinking first. I realized seconds later that I had been taken to a thread on the SWTE website which I have avoided since I made a commitment to do so a couple of months ago. I read a couple of paragraphs of the post and was immediately reminded of why I have avoided this website. I backed out right away, after being blasted with a familiar hissing sound I had heard before when I used to visit there. ...avoid that place, and regret clicking on the hyperlink that led me there today. I understand why you would want to respond to it though Brent, and as always appreciate your comments. The truth will always remian the truth though, no matter how much a couple of people want to warp it, or twist it. ---Joe Yes, I'd never been to that bb either, before clicking on Brent's link. And I was sickened too. I have a couple of theories on that board. Hear me out, this is how I go a sorting through the B.S. of life: 1) None of these people were ever in the assembly. The 'Soaring' site was instead created by people playing with experimental drugs and seeking a good discussion at the same time. 2) Or perhaps all the 'people' (besides those from this board who journey out to 'reason' with the soaring group) on the soaring site are really just one guy (named Luke or something posing as one of the twelve) posting in the name of several other people to try and build a cyber army against the truth. 3) help me out... I need more theories. This is a tough one. delila : Re:George is Innocent : delila March 03, 2004, 06:38:01 AM OH another theory on the Soaring cite:
3) ... George pays 'em to keep it up. drj : Re:George is Innocent : Mark C. March 03, 2004, 07:42:33 AM Hi All !
I must agree with Delila, Kimberley, and Joe re. the link to the "Soaring" site as it is a place where recovering Assembly folks are sure to expierence some wolf bites. I think that we must try to be protective of one another, as there are some open sores that need to heal before entering into combat again. Some of us may feel strong enough to take on that kind of fight, but we can't take the wounded with us. Enough said on that. I am also in agreement with Lucas that when we only focus on GG's adultery we are trivilizing the real problems with the Assembly and really missing the point. This was not just an issue of a church with a messed up Pastor! The link that Jack provided re. the nature of a cult is a very good article (thanks Jack) that caused me to say, "yep, that was us!" We behaved like a cult in the Assembly; that is a clear fact, and the Assembly was/is opposed to all the NT tells us His church is suppose to be like. Yes, we had Bibles, many were born again Christians; and we did a lot of Christian like things, but like the Pharisees of Jesus time we twisted it into a form that destroy lives instead of rescuing them! Many of us left the Assembly before any of these stories of GG infidelities came to light and yet we were convinced that something was wrong. Let's not trivialize those who left thinking they could not live up to the Christian life and for decades lived in great suffering as a result. How about those who abandoned any faith in Christ and those who took their lives? No! We need a bumper sticker for our cars that says, THE ASSEMBLY KILLS, just as surely as drugs do!! :'( :'( It was enough for me 12 years ago to know that GG teaching and practices were cultic and destructive to the spiritual, psychological, social, and family lives of those under it's control. His fooling around struck me when I heard it as, " it figures." For guys like Jeff, Andrew Gunther, and the like, all I can say is, "it figures", but for them I feel some real sorrow and compassion. These guys are lying to themselves and they will reap what they sow. God Bless, Mark C. : Re:George is Innocent : Scott McCumber March 03, 2004, 08:45:40 AM I am also in agreement with Lucas that when we only focus on GG's adultery we are trivilizing the real problems with the Assembly and really missing the point. This was not just an issue of a church with a messed up Pastor! God Bless, Mark C. Hi, Mark, I think that when people believe that Brent is merely trying to prove that George was an adulterer are missing the point and trivializing what he is trying to do. You are correct, proving GG's adultery just for the sake of proving it may only effect a small number of fence-sitters and skeptics and won't make the abuses of the Assembly itself any worse. However, I think Brent is trying to strike a serious blow to the Assembly's drive to rebuild (no need to continue to refer to it as the 'former Assembly', etc.). Much of the impetus to rebuild is based on the perceived lack of credibility in regards to the accusations against George. I don't know how effective this proof would be and I doubt that Brent believes it will be the killing blow, but I do know that Brent 1) has some experience in this arena, 2) understands the importance of body blows in a brawl and 3) is in this for the long haul. Again, there is more at stake with this than just "proving" GG had affairs. S : Re:George is Innocent : jesusfreak March 05, 2004, 05:41:55 AM 2) Or perhaps all the 'people' (besides those from this board who journey out to 'reason' with the soaring group) on the soaring site are really just one guy (named Luke or something posing as one of the twelve) posting in the name of several other people to try and build a cyber army against the truth. Haha, I like this one - but do I really exist? ??? ??? ::) Quite honestly, there is much that is stated on that forum which I personally do not agree with. However, if I were to allow this to govern whom I choose to spend time discussing issues with, I would hardly ever talk to anyone ;) As far as what is said on there.....I would prefer the existence of such places to be allowed, than for them to be completely outlawed. Wouldn't you? Be thankful we share the freedom toward this end, even if the responsibility it demands may be lacking. -- lucas : Re:George is Innocent : mithrandir March 05, 2004, 07:22:03 AM I'll be blunt and to the point.
First, although the facts of George's adultery add to the body of evidence proving his evil, there are plenty of other facts which also prove the evil of George and of the system he created. Believe me, there are plenty of stories out there of people who were mistreated by George and by his worthless, emasculated poser cronies. I know stories from people who could testify to being abused while living in the homes of some of these wretched men. Yes, Sterling Bennett and Jack Hanson, I've got your number. But I am not going to post those stories, because I wasn't in your homes when you were dishing it out. I do, however, know my story. And that brings me to my second point. I have said before, more than once, that the first proof of repentance on the part of an abuser is a willingness to go to the people he's wronged, and to admit that he screwed up. I know my own story. And I know that the memory of that story has filled me with intense anger at times over the last year. I know how it has felt to be treated like trash by people who thought they were sooo important. And I know that not one of them has said anything to me that sounded like repentance. Instead, I've heard what can only be described as terminal silliness when I've run into some of these people. Things like, "Brother! Haven't seen you in a while. We thought you might have come back, that you were standing at the door again!" Or, "Brother, are you encouraged?" When I've told these people that my spiritual condition is none of their business, and that, no, I'm never coming back to the Assembly, that it's a damnable cult, they have asked, "What? You don't believe in the New Testament pattern?" Get this straight: I didn't leave because of some "pattern of worship." I left because the assemblies of George Geftakys are abusive places run by jerks. I think about the unwillingness of the leaders to repent and to make things right with people like me, and sometimes I just have to remember that vengeance belongs to God and not man. But now for my third point. If anyone needs any convincing as to the evil of the existing assemblies and the jerks who lead them, feel free to get in touch with me. I'll be much more than happy to tell you all of my experiences with this group. I will name names. I will be very specific. If that doesn't convince you, then I don't think anything can convince you. Clarence Thompson : Re:George is Innocent : delila March 05, 2004, 09:52:04 AM 2) Or perhaps all the 'people' (besides those from this board who journey out to 'reason' with the soaring group) on the soaring site are really just one guy (named Luke or something posing as one of the twelve) posting in the name of several other people to try and build a cyber army against the truth. Haha, I like this one - but do I really exist? ??? ??? ::) Quite honestly, there is much that is stated on that forum which I personally do not agree with. However, if I were to allow this to govern whom I choose to spend time discussing issues with, I would hardly ever talk to anyone ;) As far as what is said on there.....I would prefer the existence of such places to be allowed, than for them to be completely outlawed. Wouldn't you? Be thankful we share the freedom toward this end, even if the responsibility it demands may be lacking. -- lucas Lucas: Thanks for knocking some of the fluff out of my conspiracy theory. Yes, they exist, these places, and no wonder... in a world where one can pay to have just about any body part pierced. And you, kind sir, exist, really. That's refreshing. Just curious though: how do you feel when you return from such a place? I was there for such a short time (seconds) but I left with a belly ache. delila : Re:George is Innocent : delila March 05, 2004, 10:06:31 AM Yes Clarence, and why did you not name names? I think that if you did, your testimony would carry more weight. Let's name names. What are people afraid of?
delila : Re:George is Innocent : editor March 05, 2004, 12:12:04 PM Yes Clarence, and why did you not name names? I think that if you did, your testimony would carry more weight. Let's name names. What are people afraid of? delila I like you Delila! :) Exactly, what are we afraid of? I never could understand anonymous posters, and such. Also, Clarence isn't afraid....but your point is well taken. Names, both our own and those of whom we speak, add weight. Discretion is assumed. Brent : Re:George is Innocent : Mark C. March 05, 2004, 04:32:11 PM I don't know how effective this proof would be and I doubt that Brent believes it will be the killing blow, but I do know that Brent 1) has some experience in this arena, 2) understands the importance of body blows in a brawl and 3) is in this for the long haul. Again, there is more at stake with this than just "proving" GG had affairs. S Thanks Scott for your clarification, I have been working some long hours and have been kind of shooting from the hip with my posts the last couple of weeks, so I am glad that you have given me an opportunity to clarify my post. There is so much I would like to say, on this and Jeff, but for now I will just say that the post of mine that you are responding to above was not critical of what Brent has been doing. I posted a week or so ago that I thought I understood what Brent was doing, and at that time proclaimed his wisdom in the matter. What I was concerned about was posting of any links to the "Soaring site", where not only are teachings of the late great Witness Lee proffered ;), but also those who are expert at rending souls in their malacious jaws! The second thing, from which you responded above, dealt with a post of Brent where he (probably tongue in cheek) talks about the adultery issue as the only really serious means to deal with the rebuidling efforts of the "addict" etc. Got to go---------------- God Bless, Mark C. : Re:George is Innocent : delila March 05, 2004, 10:44:46 PM Yes Clarence, and why did you not name names? I think that if you did, your testimony would carry more weight. Let's name names. What are people afraid of? delila People are afraid. The fear is very real. I know some x assembly people who consider me brave to go on the bb and though we are in agreement about so many things pertaining to the sorting of deception in George's dynasty, they are very much afraid of adding their voices to this board. And I'm sad for that, but some nights, I've been afraid of the dark too. Mom told us if we were bad the boogie man would get us. Though I'm 35, I have to remind myself in the middle of the night when I hear a sound that wakes me - the neighbour's cat wacking the basement window above my bed or something - that there is no boogie man, that George has no power in my life now. That I am free, that the truth is the truth, regardless of how careful people have been to cover it up. Though your tactics have sometimes snowed me Brent, I agree with you about naming names. Let all the boogie men be identified for the cowardly fools that they are. Stand up and take off your mask - all x-leaders - call a spade a spade as George would say. Remember all those times George would say: "The Lord is here, saints. That's why we come" and we all said "Amen" - it's time now to start naming all the things we were wrong about, remain wrong about, so that we can get rid of them. We don't just need to cover up, deny or rename the items in the house of George, we need to clean house. delila : Re:George is Innocent : Oscar March 05, 2004, 11:03:50 PM Folks,
I wonder if the person who maintains the "Soaring" site, (Sonia?), understands just how much GG hated the Witless Lee group. Since the Local Church and the Assembly are both Plymouth Brethren clones, GG knew he was competing with them for the same "turf". I joke about the assembly being the "One True Church" at times. However, that is exactly what GG believed. He, of course, being fundamentally dishonest would deny it if asked. I know, I asked him. However, I watched him for years...and if what a man DOES is any indicator, that's what he believed. Also, all the teaching about keeping "the Lord's presence" is nothing more than a claim to be the only true divinely authorised gathering. Did anyone ever hear him say the Lord was present anywhere else? Not that I know of. The local Church adopted a teaching from the PB's that amounts to the same thing. It is called "Claiming the Church Ground". The idea is that if you claim the church ground before anyone else does, they have to acknowledge your group as the only legitimate "expression of the body of Christ" in that locality. Remember that term? Anyway, GG would go apoplectic whenever the Local Church folks would do anything that he believed touched his "turf". He tried to sic cult researchers onto them, not that he needed to since they were on to Witless Lee long before GG came to town. As Dave S. posted, he just alerted them to his own problems.. Anyway, Sonia, or Sondra, or whoever is defending someone who hates her guts. Go figure! :-\ ;) :) :D ;D God bless, Thomas Maddux : Re:George is Innocent : jesusfreak March 06, 2004, 12:06:26 AM Lucas: Thanks for knocking some of the fluff out of my conspiracy theory. Yes, they exist, these places, and no wonder... in a world where one can pay to have just about any body part pierced. And you, kind sir, exist, really. That's refreshing. Just curious though: how do you feel when you return from such a place? I was there for such a short time (seconds) but I left with a belly ache. delila Now, what exactly is wrong with getting piercings? I personally have been considering a tattoo, which is *technically* a piercing...a lot of small, incomplete piercings.... but yeah, same issue.... really ;) As for SWTE, it is the same as everything else; depends on your reasons for experiencing it. I am there to have a thoughtful discussion on a topic that interests me. Therefore, I feel quite good when leaving, as I love a good thought-provoking conversation. Now, I personally disagree with a lot of the personal "comments" stated on that site. However, I respect these comments as the poster's right to express as per their opinion, and simply exercise my right to not care about them, thusly I don't read them. If your reason for reading through the site is based on a curiosity of who has been "commented" upon, of course you are going to get quite pissed at what is said, especially when it might be about you. Be sure to understand why before you berate. Basically, any medium through which ideas are expressed has potential; you just need to find it. -- lucas : Re:George is Innocent : d3z March 06, 2004, 07:07:40 AM Now, I personally disagree with a lot of the personal "comments" stated on that site. However, I respect these comments as the poster's right to express as per their opinion, and simply exercise my right to not care about them, thusly I don't read them. If your reason for reading through the site is based on a curiosity of who has been "commented" upon, of course you are going to get quite pissed at what is said, especially when it might be about you. Be sure to understand why before you berate. Concerning the issue of "free speech": Free speech not only governs a person's ability to speak their mind on a topic, but it also guarantees others the right to speak out against what the first person said. Declaring someone as false doesn't go against their freedom of speech, it is just exercising mine (defamation, slander, libel are a different issue, basically one of going too far). : Re:George is Innocent : delila March 06, 2004, 08:28:24 AM Lucas: Thanks for knocking some of the fluff out of my conspiracy theory. Yes, they exist, these places, and no wonder... in a world where one can pay to have just about any body part pierced. And you, kind sir, exist, really. That's refreshing. Just curious though: how do you feel when you return from such a place? I was there for such a short time (seconds) but I left with a belly ache. delila Now, what exactly is wrong with getting piercings? I personally have been considering a tattoo, which is *technically* a piercing...a lot of small, incomplete piercings.... but yeah, same issue.... really ;) As for SWTE, it is the same as everything else; depends on your reasons for experiencing it. I am there to have a thoughtful discussion on a topic that interests me. Therefore, I feel quite good when leaving, as I love a good thought-provoking conversation. Now, I personally disagree with a lot of the personal "comments" stated on that site. However, I respect these comments as the poster's right to express as per their opinion, and simply exercise my right to not care about them, thusly I don't read them. If your reason for reading through the site is based on a curiosity of who has been "commented" upon, of course you are going to get quite pissed at what is said, especially when it might be about you. Be sure to understand why before you berate. Basically, any medium through which ideas are expressed has potential; you just need to find it. -- lucas Lucas: Good luck with your postings and your piercings. btw: I have nothing against piercing. My daughter and I just got our ears pierced last month. About swte: perhaps the cite needs a new name. I'll say no more. drj : Re:George is Innocent : al Hartman March 06, 2004, 08:56:40 AM Now, what exactly is wrong with getting piercings? I personally have been considering a tattoo, which is *technically* a piercing...a lot of small, incomplete piercings.... but yeah, same issue.... really ;) lucas OK, Lucas, as long as you realize that your tattoo will lump you into the same category with Christmas trees, television & wicca, and that none of us will ever be able to have anything to do with you ever again!!! ;D ;D ;D al ;) : Re:George is Innocent : editor March 06, 2004, 10:07:24 AM Now, what exactly is wrong with getting piercings? I personally have been considering a tattoo, which is *technically* a piercing...a lot of small, incomplete piercings.... but yeah, same issue.... really ;) lucas OK, Lucas, as long as you realize that your tattoo will lump you into the same category with Christmas trees, television & wicca, and that none of us will ever be able to have anything to do with you ever again!!! ;D ;D ;D al ;) I know this guy who celebrates Christmas, has a tatoo, and a pierced eyebrow! Man, do I feel better than him! ;) On another note, why not pierce internal body parts. In this case, we can have the satisfaction of knowing that we did it as a statement, and not just for shock value. Brent : Re:George is Innocent : Joe Sperling March 06, 2004, 08:29:41 PM Brent----
You may have just opened a new market. There could be a new section in body piercing stores with "spleen rings", or "kidney spikes" or even "tonsil rings" for those who still have them. --Joe : Re:George is Innocent : d3z March 06, 2004, 09:56:04 PM I have several stainless steel screws in my shoulder. Does that count?
: Re:George is Innocent : moonflower2 March 06, 2004, 10:10:48 PM However, I think Brent is trying to strike a serious blow to the Assembly's drive to rebuild (no need to continue to refer to it as the 'former Assembly', etc.). Much of the impetus to rebuild is based on the perceived lack of credibility in regards to the accusations against George. I don't know how effective this proof would be and I doubt that Brent believes it will be the killing blow, but I do know that Brent 1) has some experience in this arena, 2) understands the importance of body blows in a brawl and 3) is in this for the long haul. Again, there is more at stake with this than just "proving" GG had affairs. S Yes! And his alleged sexual liasons are factual evidence of the spirit driving George. It is not a "subjective" experience of someone who was emotionally and spiritually hurt by the abuses of assembly folk. Moonflower2 : Re:George is Innocent : jesusfreak March 07, 2004, 12:27:53 AM Now, I personally disagree with a lot of the personal "comments" stated on that site. However, I respect these comments as the poster's right to express as per their opinion, and simply exercise my right to not care about them, thusly I don't read them. If your reason for reading through the site is based on a curiosity of who has been "commented" upon, of course you are going to get quite pissed at what is said, especially when it might be about you. Be sure to understand why before you berate. Concerning the issue of "free speech": Free speech not only governs a person's ability to speak their mind on a topic, but it also guarantees others the right to speak out against what the first person said. Declaring someone as false doesn't go against their freedom of speech, it is just exercising mine (defamation, slander, libel are a different issue, basically one of going too far). Of course, but doing so would be recognizing the relevance of what they said in the first place. Ie, that you feel their opinion on a given topic is valuable enough to refute. I would personally just prefer to ignore these kinds of opinions than to entertain their existence. -- lucas : Re:George is Innocent : jesusfreak March 07, 2004, 01:31:15 AM I know this guy who celebrates Christmas, has a tatoo, and a pierced eyebrow! Man, do I feel better than him! ;) On another note, why not pierce internal body parts. In this case, we can have the satisfaction of knowing that we did it as a statement, and not just for shock value. Brent I dunno, it would be quite shocking to see a stud sticking through a person's midsection...... ;) -- lucas : Re:George is Innocent : editor March 07, 2004, 01:36:58 AM I know this guy who celebrates Christmas, has a tatoo, and a pierced eyebrow! Man, do I feel better than him! ;) On another note, why not pierce internal body parts. In this case, we can have the satisfaction of knowing that we did it as a statement, and not just for shock value. Brent I dunno, it would be quite shocking to see a stud sticking through a person's midsection...... ;) -- lucas I mean totally internal, so it doesn't show. Then, it demonstrates true committment to art. Brent : Re:George is Innocent : areyougettingit March 07, 2004, 01:51:12 AM Brent,
I decided to reply to your post because I do not agree with what you wrote and I do not believe that you believe it either. Just because you cannot prove that GG is guily it does not mean that he is innocent, now does it? It may be just as difficult to prove that he is innocent as it is to prove that he is guilty. And it is not our job to prove him innocent. Would we have a BB if we believed he was innocent? Even if we do not have factual evidence that he had sexual relationship with women what we know for a fact is that he is among the ones that are responsible for the deep emotional scars we all have. He is the one that brainwashed us and took away our dreams and goals. In many cases even our identity and freedom down to the very last bite. He was a CULT leader and the Assembly was a CULT. One characteristics of the CULT is that the leader believes he is God or at least he hears God better that any of us. Our agenda should be to make sure people like GG and his followers will NEVER be in power again. Our responsibility here on the BB is to make sure that we make people aware of what is/was going on in the Assembly. Are not we all emotionally hurt by all what happened? Is that what we want for the innocent newcomers to experience and reflect on a year from today? Can someone tell me when we are going to file a class action law suit against these people? areyougettingit : Re:George is Innocent : Scott McCumber March 07, 2004, 02:02:25 AM Brent, I decided to reply to your post because I do not agree with what you wrote and I do not believe that you believe it either. Just because you cannot prove that GG is guily it does not mean that he is innocent, now does it? It may be just as difficult to prove that he is innocent as it is to prove that he is guilty. And it is not our job to prove him innocent. Would we have a BB if we believed he was innocent? Even if we do not have factual evidence that he had sexual relationship with women what we know for a fact is that he is among the ones that are responsible for the deep emotional scars we all have. He is the one that brainwashed us and took away our dreams and goals. In many cases even our identity and freedom down to the very last bite. He was a CULT leader and the Assembly was a CULT. One characteristics of the CULT is that the leader believes he is God or at least he hears God better that any of us. Our agenda should be to make sure people like GG and his followers will NEVER be in power again. Our responsibility here on the BB is to make sure that we make people aware of what is/was going on in the Assembly. Are not we all emotionally hurt by all what happened? Is that what we want for the innocent newcomers to experience and reflect on a year from today? Can someone tell me when we are going to file a class action law suit against these people? areyougettingit Who's we? Who are you? What's your agenda? Where have you been the last year? Far as I can tell Brent has done about 90% of the work to bring down GG's ministry. Far as I know you have done 0%. When are you going to start? When you can sign your name? On what grounds specifically would you like to file a suit? Are you paying for it to be filed? How much do you have to pitch in? Areyoufeelinme? : Re:George is Innocent : Oscar March 07, 2004, 02:05:34 AM Tom, Delila ,Mark C., and Vern (along with a couple others) Honestly I hardly think it worth addressing these people. When I hear these people I feel like Jonah as I’m sure many on the SWTE board do. I think why God?? It would have been better to have died in a whales stomach than to listen and hear this mess from these people.. One of the best things I think I ever heard God say in the Bible is when he admitted Himself that the people of Nineveh were stupid but that he still cared for their souls. Anybody remember this (Calvinists lend ear). God said to Jonah, “And should I not spare Nineveh, that great city, wherein are more than six score thousand persons that cannot discern between their right hand and their left hand; and also much cattle?” These people were dumbies. But, like with Jonah, God continues to use people who would rather be doing something else with their lives to reach the lost and the stupid because God still cares. I attended a church for a number of years that was always taking special offerings to maintain the ministry. No, the money was not begged for but it was always asked for. At first I was giving every time they said there was a need sometimes without asking God what He wanted me to do. But I thought of course God wants me to give. Also, I saw everybody else giving and I did not want to appear stingy with my money. I asked God why is it that I give when it is asked for and I am not reaping any? The answer was simple. I was giving because man asked of me and not God. Also, because my emotions led my actions and not His Spirit. So, for a period of time I had to sit in the pews and pass the offering bucket because God was telling me not to give. Sounds crazy right? I sat there near the same people I had for years and passed the bucket. Seeing some friends give money that had less money than me. I went through the feelings of guilt. Every time I asked God can I give now? And for a month the answer was no. Then at the end of a month I knew God told me “yes. You can give again but, remember to listen if it is Me asking it of You.” Some of you may say that that is silly spiritualism. Whatever. We are suppose to be led of God. We are suppose to hear His voice. We are suppose to walk under his direction “to the left, to the right.” Since then I have experienced the blessing of sowing and reaping. This lesson was the purpose of my experience. I could have left there upset with my pastor for asking for money but I knew God had me where he wanted me at that time. God knows the tool to use and the method to produce results. That is if we are moldable. When I read comments like Mark C.’s, “What I was concerned about was posting of any links to the "Soaring site", where not only are teachings of the late great Witness Lee proffered , but also those who are expert at rending souls in their malacious jaws!” I am amazed. Do not others judge this tree by its fruit? Or are these vicious slanderings a “new” fruit of the Spirit which I have not heard of? The people on this bulletin board seem to go from under one “ego-maniac (G.G.)” that they complain about on a daily basis to submitting to the ideas of another group of ego-maniacs who want to filter what the others on their precious ABB experience. The ABB is exactly what we do not want to see happen in Iraq. The hoards of people being transferred from one legalistic abusive regime to another. But the fact of the matter is in the end the people of Iraq will be led by who they want to be led by. While those that saw the abuse and offered a way of escape can only in the end say that they tried to help them. The people on this ABB that are sincere in their search for truth ought “remember” not to dwell on the bondage they experienced in their Egypt experience. But rather they should remember the deliverance and the God who is Mighty to save that split the seas and released them into new territory. And remember the promise God gave concerning their future. I am afraid that if people here do not start thinking for themselves and depending wholeheartedly on God to be able to show them the way into the promised land then, they will find themselves once again surrounded by pyramids. How could this happen? It is crucial who the innocents on the ABB are listening to. Remember in Numbers 13 when Moses sent spies to search out the land of Canaan that God had given to His people. When the spies came back to the camp they said yes the land is good BUT, the people are strong that live there and they put fear in the hearts of the children of Israel. Caleb was the one to still the commotion and say “Let us go up at once, and possess it; for we are well able to overcome!” When the people heard this it says in Numbers 14 that they cried and they remembered Egypt and the wilderness. Then they started saying “were it not better for us to return into Egypt?” And in verse 4 they said “ Let us make a captain, and let us return into Egypt” God places us in situations that we can walk away from with Him and have learned more about Who He IS. Or we can walk away but stay wandering and seeking out another person to lead us. The leader the children of Israel chose to direct their thoughts and actions were people that were giving direction from a point of hurt and fear instead of faith. The children of Israel wished more to speak of the past abuses of their Egyptian slave masters than to focus on their future promise. In the end God said these people that cried and were full of doubt based on their experiences would not see the promised land. Who would see the promised land? Caleb. Why? Numbers 14:24- “Because he had another spirit with him, and hath followed Me fully, him will I bring into the land wherein he went; and his seed shall possess it.” So, I would encourage the “innocents” of the ABB to take responsibility for and be accountable for their actions that involved them with G.G. ministries. Understanding that there is no condemnation in Christ. Do not heed the messages that spew of pride, hate and hurt from the mouths of the ‘so-called’ wise (Tom, Delila ,Mark C., and Vern to name a few). But rather in fullness of faith and with the help of the Holy Spirit be led in strength not looking back to the pillars of sand that lie in the past. Enter into the land that was promised you. Dear Sarahhoffee, I do not know much about Delilah, but I consider it an honor to be included on your list of bad guys with Mark C. and Verne. If being associated with such men is my worst failing...I'll count myself blessed. However, it would be nice to know exactly what I am accused of, other than vague accusations about "spewing out hate and hurt". Would you be so kind as to try to be specific? Perhaps you could make a brief list of my transgressions? I must confess I find your long treatise somewhat vague. In fact, I can't understand it at all! Perhaps, I am like the Ninevite "dumbies". Most theologians think that this refers to children, not stupid people. But then, I do not claim special enlightment from God. God bless, Thomas Maddux : Re:George is Innocent : Scott McCumber March 07, 2004, 02:19:02 AM Dear Sarahhoffee, I do not know much about Delilah, but I consider it an honor to be included on your list of bad guys with Mark C. and Verne. If being associated with such men is my worst failing...I'll count myself blessed. However, it would be nice to know exactly what I am accused of, other than vague accusations about "spewing out hate and hurt". Would you be so kind as to try to be specific? Perhaps you could make a brief list of my transgressions? I must confess I find your long treatise somewhat vague. In fact, I can't understand it at all! Perhaps, I am like the Ninevite "dumbies". Most theologians think that this refers to children, not stupid people. But then, I do not claim special enlightment from God. God bless, Thomas Maddux Tom, The reason you don't understand it is not because it is non-sensical ravings. No, quite the opposite. Your posts are non-sensical because they are from the flesh. You can't understand Sarah because she is much more in tune with the spirit of God than you are. If you would just open up to the spirit, these things would be much more clear to you. In the meantime, Sarah and company will just have to shake their collective head sadly as you stumble through the darkness. ;) S : Re:George is Innocent : Eulaha L. Long March 07, 2004, 02:26:10 AM How much does it cost to file a class action suit? I would be glad to pitch in...
: Re:George is Innocent : jesusfreak March 07, 2004, 02:33:25 AM Brent, Re-read what is being said. Brent has not stated that GG is categorically innocent of every allegation brought against him. All he has stated is that he realizes it is amazingly unfair to bring accusations without available substantiation. This is entirely in reference to the accused infidelity. I decided to reply to your post because I do not agree with what you wrote and I do not believe that you believe it either. Just because you cannot prove that GG is guily it does not mean that he is innocent, now does it? It may be just as difficult to prove that he is innocent as it is to prove that he is guilty. And it is not our job to prove him innocent. Would we have a BB if we believed he was innocent? If I required no evidence before casting accusation, I can easily call you a pilferer of goats. So let's say I do...prove to me that you do not steal goats. How are you able to do so beyond the shadow of any doubt? You should not have to prove your own innocence; you only need to prove that the evidence brought against you does not prove your guilt. *THIS* is why Brent has stated his withdrawal from backing the accusation of this particular sin of GG's, he has no available proof. It is *not* because he believes GG to be innocent, but only that GG is innocent until there is reason to believe otherwise (ie, proof). Anyway, GG is responsible for a greater many other things; things which *DO* have the backing of proof. Our agenda should be to make sure people like GG and his followers will NEVER be in power again. Our responsibility here on the BB is to make sure that we make people aware of what is/was going on in the Assembly. Are not we all emotionally hurt by all what happened? Is that what we want for the innocent newcomers to experience and reflect on a year from today? Is this really why you are on this board? To ensure the assemblies never rise again? This is a medium of discussion, not a list of entreaties for their demise. Obviously, included within these many discussions are evidences of the wrongs within the assemblies, but they are not meant as a "point by point" listing of faults.If you strongly feel there should be more action against those who "wronged" you, than take it. What is stopping you? -- lucas : Re:George is Innocent : jesusfreak March 07, 2004, 02:35:53 AM I know this guy who celebrates Christmas, has a tatoo, and a pierced eyebrow! Man, do I feel better than him! ;) On another note, why not pierce internal body parts. In this case, we can have the satisfaction of knowing that we did it as a statement, and not just for shock value. Brent I dunno, it would be quite shocking to see a stud sticking through a person's midsection...... ;) -- lucas I mean totally internal, so it doesn't show. Then, it demonstrates true committment to art. Brent ohhh, that would be.....interesting ;) speaking of which, guess what the new "teen craze" is? http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/2900131/detail.html (http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/2900131/detail.html) Branding! :o -- lucas : Re:George is Innocent : areyougettingit March 07, 2004, 03:33:07 AM >Who's we? Who are you? What's your agenda? Where have you been the last year?
We, the people that were emotionally scarred. My name is not important. What matters is that I am on your side. My agenda is what I wrote in the post: to make sure more innocent people will not be involved in this Assembly=CULT thing. That is once again something that does not matter. Fyi: I have been doing my homework. I was not ready to speak out loud. >Far as I can tell Brent has done about 90% of the work to bring down GG's ministry. Far as I know you have done 0%. When are you going to start? When you can sign your name? I give a lot of credit to Brent and I applaude his efforts. I can only wish I did it myself. But the question remains would any of your efforts matter if the Assembly gets back up again and innocent souls get twisted? I think it is time for us to pull it together and fight back. We just have to stay focused and accomplish the agenda. What is our Agenda? >On what grounds specifically would you like to file a suit? Are you paying for it to be filed? How much do you have to pitch in? I sense a little sarcasm here. Did you really think that by verbally expressing our feelings on a tiny corner of the web would accomplish the agenda? Have you been emotionally or physically abused, mistreated, misguided, taken advantage of, controlled, etc while you were in the Assembly? Do you think you are the only one like that? If I may ask, how much of your own money you gave to GG's Assembly while you were in it? Would you not want to make sure that this time your money is well spent? Plus, if only what I read on the BB was true, I think we have a legitimate case against the exploit that occured. I believe we need to be united and talk about what our goal is. And I am convinced there will be enough people to testify... areyougettingit : Re:George is Innocent : sarahhoffee March 07, 2004, 03:34:28 AM I decided to remove my post from this board. It will still remain on SWTE. Scott- I couldn't have expressed it more eloquently. ;) : Re:George is Innocent : jesusfreak March 07, 2004, 03:41:15 AM I decided to remove my post from this board. It will still remain on SWTE. Scott- I couldn't have expressed it more eloquently. ;) Why did you remove it? Are you not confident enough in your own views to let them stand as what you believe? How can you possibly comment on anything anyone else has to say if you are not willing to *state* what *you* think? Honestly, do not expect to be taken seriously if you remain thusly obtuse. -- lucas : Re:George is Innocent : Scott McCumber March 07, 2004, 03:43:40 AM I decided to remove my post from this board. It will still remain on SWTE. Scott- I couldn't have expressed it more eloquently. ;) Sarah, I know. S : Re:George is Innocent : Scott McCumber March 07, 2004, 03:56:55 AM >On what grounds specifically would you like to file a suit? Are you paying for it to be filed? How much do you have to pitch in? I sense a little sarcasm here. Did you really think that by verbally expressing our feelings on a tiny corner of the web would accomplish the agenda? Have you been emotionally or physically abused, mistreated, misguided, taken advantage of, controlled, etc while you were in the Assembly? Do you think you are the only one like that? If I may ask, how much of your own money you gave to GG's Assembly while you were in it? Would you not want to make sure that this time your money is well spent? Plus, if only what I read on the BB was true, I think we have a legitimate case against the exploit that occured. I believe we need to be united and talk about what our goal is. And I am convinced there will be enough people to testify... areyougettingit Not at all sarcastic. A legit question that has been bandied about for a year. Still waiting for a response that will work. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, you're just coming into the conversation a little late and preaching to the choir. Open to suggestions, though we normally grant more credibility to those who can post their name. Again, the reasons for that have been discussed for over a year now, also. Do a little more homework, friend. You're almost there. Scott McCumber : Re:George is Innocent : Mark C. March 07, 2004, 04:23:16 AM Sounds crazy right?------ Some of you may say that that is silly spiritualism. Whatever. When I read comments like Mark C.’s, “What I was concerned about was posting of any links to the "Soaring site", where not only are teachings of the late great Witness Lee proffered , but also those who are expert at rending souls in their malacious jaws!” I am amazed. Do not others judge this tree by its fruit? Or are these vicious slanderings a “new” fruit of the Spirit which I have not heard of? The people on this bulletin board seem to go from under one “ego-maniac (G.G.)” that they complain about on a daily basis to submitting to the ideas of another group of ego-maniacs who want to filter what the others on their precious ABB experience. The ABB is exactly what we do not want to see happen in Iraq. I am afraid that if people here do not start thinking for themselves and depending wholeheartedly on God to be able to show them the way into the promised land then, they will find themselves once again surrounded by pyramids. How could this happen? It is crucial who the innocents on the ABB are listening to. God places us in situations that we can walk away from with Him and have learned more about Who He IS. Or we can walk away but stay wandering and seeking out another person to lead us. The leader the children of Israel chose to direct their thoughts and actions were people that were giving direction from a point of hurt and fear instead of faith. So, I would encourage the “innocents” of the ABB to take responsibility for and be accountable for their actions that involved them with G.G. ministries. Understanding that there is no condemnation in Christ. Do not heed the messages that spew of pride, hate and hurt from the mouths of the ‘so-called’ wise (Tom, Delila ,Mark C., and Vern to name a few). But rather in fullness of faith and with the help of the Holy Spirit be led in strength not looking back to the pillars of sand that lie in the past. Enter into the land that was promised you. Hello SaraHoffe, I take it that you are upset with me. As with Tom, I had trouble following your thinking, but it seems that you believe that I am some kind of leader here. I am just one of a number of posters here who share our opinions on the Assembly. We would have a better conversation if you were more specific with the issues that you disagree with me about. I believe that your main concerns were the things that I said about the "Soaring" site. I do not read on the "Soaring" site, and so my "negative" comments were only re. the link that Brent provided in his post. When Sondra posted on this BB she held teachings that were very similar (if not the same) to Witness lee which are clearly heretical. I attempted to engage her in conversation and she refused all attempts at entreaty. I sense the influence of her postulations in your rambling post, and you even seem to sense that people might believe such thinking is crazy (see your quote above). Where Matt is in all this I don't know, but it has been my personal experience that he is not only not honest, but is malacious; in other words he is a danger to those seeking recovery from the Assembly, and the Bible identifies these kinds of people as wolves. Yes, he is just a pup in his wolf like ways, but if he continues on his present course I predict a full grown set of teeth. It is not "bringing condemnation, fear, and guilt" to identify evil and avoid it. Paul was very strong in his condemnation of those who preached the false kind of spiritualism that Sondra proffers. If you wish, we can have a specific discussion where we can talk about it in some detail and I can make clear to you why I say what I say above. You say, "God should lead us alone", what do you mean by that? What exactly causes you to believe that I, along with others, are leading people by, "fear, guilt,etc." ? and, what do you mean by following the Lord in "the fullness of faith and with the help of the Holy Spirit?" How does God do this for you and how can we follow your admonition to do so? Yes, it does seem "crazy" to me, and it does appear that you are following some kind of false "spiritualism", but "whatever" is a very poor response to what some wiser sense may be alerting you to when you made that comment. I wish you only to know the truth of the Gospel and the blessing of a true walk of faith with God. Good clear Biblical thinking is the only solid foundation to attain this goal. False spiritualism that believes in some inner sense to guide them is indeed only an "ego" experience based on one's emotions. At the least it is sensual, and at the worst it can be demonic. I know as I have been there and done that! :'( It led a good friend of mine into a psychiatric ward and eventually to rejecting any belief in God. God Bless, Mark C. : Re:George is Innocent : editor March 07, 2004, 04:30:48 AM >Who's we? Who are you? What's your agenda? Where have you been the last year? We, the people that were emotionally scarred. My name is not important. What matters is that I am on your side. My agenda is what I wrote in the post: to make sure more innocent people will not be involved in this Assembly=CULT thing. That is once again something that does not matter. Fyi: I have been doing my homework. I was not ready to speak out loud. >Far as I can tell Brent has done about 90% of the work to bring down GG's ministry. Far as I know you have done 0%. When are you going to start? When you can sign your name? I give a lot of credit to Brent and I applaude his efforts. I can only wish I did it myself. But the question remains would any of your efforts matter if the Assembly gets back up again and innocent souls get twisted? I think it is time for us to pull it together and fight back. We just have to stay focused and accomplish the agenda. What is our Agenda? >On what grounds specifically would you like to file a suit? Are you paying for it to be filed? How much do you have to pitch in? I sense a little sarcasm here. Did you really think that by verbally expressing our feelings on a tiny corner of the web would accomplish the agenda? Have you been emotionally or physically abused, mistreated, misguided, taken advantage of, controlled, etc while you were in the Assembly? Do you think you are the only one like that? If I may ask, how much of your own money you gave to GG's Assembly while you were in it? Would you not want to make sure that this time your money is well spent? Plus, if only what I read on the BB was true, I think we have a legitimate case against the exploit that occured. I believe we need to be united and talk about what our goal is. And I am convinced there will be enough people to testify... areyougettingit I'm quite interested. email me. Brent : Re:George is Innocent : sfortescue March 07, 2004, 04:31:16 AM As for theories on who areyougettingit is, one possibility is that this might be a reappearance of Laurie / St. Louis sister.
: Re:George is Innocent : Scott McCumber March 07, 2004, 04:43:24 AM As for theories on who areyougettingit is, one possibility is that this might be a reappearance of Laurie / St. Louis sister. It crossed my mind! And it wouldn't have to be that particular person. It could be someone similar. Or a random troll. Ya never know! ;) S : Re:George is Innocent : Kimberley Tobin March 07, 2004, 06:48:30 AM Tom, Delila ,Mark C., and Vern (along with a couple others) Honestly I hardly think it worth addressing these people. When I hear these people I feel like Jonah as I’m sure many on the SWTE board do. I think why God?? It would have been better to have died in a whales stomach than to listen and hear this mess from these people.. One of the best things I think I ever heard God say in the Bible is when he admitted Himself that the people of Nineveh were stupid but that he still cared for their souls. Anybody remember this (Calvinists lend ear). God said to Jonah, “And should I not spare Nineveh, that great city, wherein are more than six score thousand persons that cannot discern between their right hand and their left hand; and also much cattle?” These people were dumbies. But, like with Jonah, God continues to use people who would rather be doing something else with their lives to reach the lost and the stupid because God still cares. I attended a church for a number of years that was always taking special offerings to maintain the ministry. No, the money was not begged for but it was always asked for. At first I was giving every time they said there was a need sometimes without asking God what He wanted me to do. But I thought of course God wants me to give. Also, I saw everybody else giving and I did not want to appear stingy with my money. I asked God why is it that I give when it is asked for and I am not reaping any? The answer was simple. I was giving because man asked of me and not God. Also, because my emotions led my actions and not His Spirit. So, for a period of time I had to sit in the pews and pass the offering bucket because God was telling me not to give. Sounds crazy right? I sat there near the same people I had for years and passed the bucket. Seeing some friends give money that had less money than me. I went through the feelings of guilt. Every time I asked God can I give now? And for a month the answer was no. Then at the end of a month I knew God told me “yes. You can give again but, remember to listen if it is Me asking it of You.” Some of you may say that that is silly spiritualism. Whatever. We are suppose to be led of God. We are suppose to hear His voice. We are suppose to walk under his direction “to the left, to the right.” Since then I have experienced the blessing of sowing and reaping. This lesson was the purpose of my experience. I could have left there upset with my pastor for asking for money but I knew God had me where he wanted me at that time. God knows the tool to use and the method to produce results. That is if we are moldable. When I read comments like Mark C.’s, “What I was concerned about was posting of any links to the "Soaring site", where not only are teachings of the late great Witness Lee proffered , but also those who are expert at rending souls in their malacious jaws!” I am amazed. Do not others judge this tree by its fruit? Or are these vicious slanderings a “new” fruit of the Spirit which I have not heard of? The people on this bulletin board seem to go from under one “ego-maniac (G.G.)” that they complain about on a daily basis to submitting to the ideas of another group of ego-maniacs who want to filter what the others on their precious ABB experience. The ABB is exactly what we do not want to see happen in Iraq. The hoards of people being transferred from one legalistic abusive regime to another. But the fact of the matter is in the end the people of Iraq will be led by who they want to be led by. While those that saw the abuse and offered a way of escape can only in the end say that they tried to help them. The people on this ABB that are sincere in their search for truth ought “remember” not to dwell on the bondage they experienced in their Egypt experience. But rather they should remember the deliverance and the God who is Mighty to save that split the seas and released them into new territory. And remember the promise God gave concerning their future. I am afraid that if people here do not start thinking for themselves and depending wholeheartedly on God to be able to show them the way into the promised land then, they will find themselves once again surrounded by pyramids. How could this happen? It is crucial who the innocents on the ABB are listening to. Remember in Numbers 13 when Moses sent spies to search out the land of Canaan that God had given to His people. When the spies came back to the camp they said yes the land is good BUT, the people are strong that live there and they put fear in the hearts of the children of Israel. Caleb was the one to still the commotion and say “Let us go up at once, and possess it; for we are well able to overcome!” When the people heard this it says in Numbers 14 that they cried and they remembered Egypt and the wilderness. Then they started saying “were it not better for us to return into Egypt?” And in verse 4 they said “ Let us make a captain, and let us return into Egypt” God places us in situations that we can walk away from with Him and have learned more about Who He IS. Or we can walk away but stay wandering and seeking out another person to lead us. The leader the children of Israel chose to direct their thoughts and actions were people that were giving direction from a point of hurt and fear instead of faith. The children of Israel wished more to speak of the past abuses of their Egyptian slave masters than to focus on their future promise. In the end God said these people that cried and were full of doubt based on their experiences would not see the promised land. Who would see the promised land? Caleb. Why? Numbers 14:24- “Because he had another spirit with him, and hath followed Me fully, him will I bring into the land wherein he went; and his seed shall possess it.” So, I would encourage the “innocents” of the ABB to take responsibility for and be accountable for their actions that involved them with G.G. ministries. Understanding that there is no condemnation in Christ. Do not heed the messages that spew of pride, hate and hurt from the mouths of the ‘so-called’ wise (Tom, Delila ,Mark C., and Vern to name a few). But rather in fullness of faith and with the help of the Holy Spirit be led in strength not looking back to the pillars of sand that lie in the past. Enter into the land that was promised you. Dear Sarahhoffee, I do not know much about Delilah, but I consider it an honor to be included on your list of bad guys with Mark C. and Verne. If being associated with such men is my worst failing...I'll count myself blessed. However, it would be nice to know exactly what I am accused of, other than vague accusations about "spewing out hate and hurt". Would you be so kind as to try to be specific? Perhaps you could make a brief list of my transgressions? I must confess I find your long treatise somewhat vague. In fact, I can't understand it at all! Perhaps, I am like the Ninevite "dumbies". Most theologians think that this refers to children, not stupid people. But then, I do not claim special enlightment from God. God bless, Thomas Maddux Sarah, Since you deleted your comment on this BB and yet others have quoted it and it still remains, I feel the need to comment. You are the kind of person and reason I fled the assembly more than a year ago. You are equating the people of this BB to that of "stupid" people (God never calls people "stupid", Sarah.) He said, as you quoted, that they cannot discern their right hand from their left. That is not calling people "stupid". Your ilk makes me want to vomit (reminiscent of the Laodecian church)! I absolutely can tell my left hand from my right, finally, after leaving the assembly. I have not exchanged one idol (ie GG and his LB's) for another (ie Brent or Mark or Verne or, you fill in the blank.) I have finally given my complete loyalty to the Lord Jesus Christ, and NO MAN, is going to lead me down the primrose path ever again, including the likes of you and your aunt. You at the SWTE site say you distance yourself from GG and stand against his teaching and yet you spew the same filth that I received in my fifteen years in the assembly. GOOD RIDANCE! Who are you to start bringing in your metaphors of the bible (ie egypt and being delivered from our bondage, etc) and equating that to what is going on here on this BB? You are RIDICULOUS! The people here are simply here to discuss what they experienced in the assembly, to dialogue about it, to heal from it and yes, to move forward in their lives. You MAKE ME SICK! You use examples from the Old Testament and equate that to what is going on here on this BB to make people feel guily about where they're at and to make them feel like they are just like the Israelites God led out of Egypt. You are A WOLF IN SHEEPS CLOTHING. CUT FROM THE SAME CLOTH AS THE LEADERS IN THE ASSEMBLY. We don't want your kind of "encouragement" here. Go to your SWTE site and spew your filth there. We're here, thinking for ourselves, and yes, identifying the abuse we suffered under a CULT and helping one another in the healing process. We don't need your kind here spewing the kind of filth you spew! : Re:George is Innocent : delila March 07, 2004, 06:48:58 AM Tom, Delila ,Mark C., and Vern (along with a couple others) Honestly I hardly think it worth addressing these people. When I hear these people I feel like Jonah as I’m sure many on the SWTE board do. I think why God?? It would have been better to have died in a whales stomach than to listen and hear this mess from these people.. One of the best things I think I ever heard God say in the Bible is when he admitted Himself that the people of Nineveh were stupid but that he still cared for their souls. Anybody remember this (Calvinists lend ear). God said to Jonah, “And should I not spare Nineveh, that great city, wherein are more than six score thousand persons that cannot discern between their right hand and their left hand; and also much cattle?” These people were dumbies. But, like with Jonah, God continues to use people who would rather be doing something else with their lives to reach the lost and the stupid because God still cares. I attended a church for a number of years that was always taking special offerings to maintain the ministry. No, the money was not begged for but it was always asked for. At first I was giving every time they said there was a need sometimes without asking God what He wanted me to do. But I thought of course God wants me to give. Also, I saw everybody else giving and I did not want to appear stingy with my money. I asked God why is it that I give when it is asked for and I am not reaping any? The answer was simple. I was giving because man asked of me and not God. Also, because my emotions led my actions and not His Spirit. So, for a period of time I had to sit in the pews and pass the offering bucket because God was telling me not to give. Sounds crazy right? I sat there near the same people I had for years and passed the bucket. Seeing some friends give money that had less money than me. I went through the feelings of guilt. Every time I asked God can I give now? And for a month the answer was no. Then at the end of a month I knew God told me “yes. You can give again but, remember to listen if it is Me asking it of You.” Some of you may say that that is silly spiritualism. Whatever. We are suppose to be led of God. We are suppose to hear His voice. We are suppose to walk under his direction “to the left, to the right.” Since then I have experienced the blessing of sowing and reaping. This lesson was the purpose of my experience. I could have left there upset with my pastor for asking for money but I knew God had me where he wanted me at that time. God knows the tool to use and the method to produce results. That is if we are moldable. When I read comments like Mark C.’s, “What I was concerned about was posting of any links to the "Soaring site", where not only are teachings of the late great Witness Lee proffered , but also those who are expert at rending souls in their malacious jaws!” I am amazed. Do not others judge this tree by its fruit? Or are these vicious slanderings a “new” fruit of the Spirit which I have not heard of? The people on this bulletin board seem to go from under one “ego-maniac (G.G.)” that they complain about on a daily basis to submitting to the ideas of another group of ego-maniacs who want to filter what the others on their precious ABB experience. The ABB is exactly what we do not want to see happen in Iraq. The hoards of people being transferred from one legalistic abusive regime to another. But the fact of the matter is in the end the people of Iraq will be led by who they want to be led by. While those that saw the abuse and offered a way of escape can only in the end say that they tried to help them. The people on this ABB that are sincere in their search for truth ought “remember” not to dwell on the bondage they experienced in their Egypt experience. But rather they should remember the deliverance and the God who is Mighty to save that split the seas and released them into new territory. And remember the promise God gave concerning their future. I am afraid that if people here do not start thinking for themselves and depending wholeheartedly on God to be able to show them the way into the promised land then, they will find themselves once again surrounded by pyramids. How could this happen? It is crucial who the innocents on the ABB are listening to. Remember in Numbers 13 when Moses sent spies to search out the land of Canaan that God had given to His people. When the spies came back to the camp they said yes the land is good BUT, the people are strong that live there and they put fear in the hearts of the children of Israel. Caleb was the one to still the commotion and say “Let us go up at once, and possess it; for we are well able to overcome!” When the people heard this it says in Numbers 14 that they cried and they remembered Egypt and the wilderness. Then they started saying “were it not better for us to return into Egypt?” And in verse 4 they said “ Let us make a captain, and let us return into Egypt” God places us in situations that we can walk away from with Him and have learned more about Who He IS. Or we can walk away but stay wandering and seeking out another person to lead us. The leader the children of Israel chose to direct their thoughts and actions were people that were giving direction from a point of hurt and fear instead of faith. The children of Israel wished more to speak of the past abuses of their Egyptian slave masters than to focus on their future promise. In the end God said these people that cried and were full of doubt based on their experiences would not see the promised land. Who would see the promised land? Caleb. Why? Numbers 14:24- “Because he had another spirit with him, and hath followed Me fully, him will I bring into the land wherein he went; and his seed shall possess it.” So, I would encourage the “innocents” of the ABB to take responsibility for and be accountable for their actions that involved them with G.G. ministries. Understanding that there is no condemnation in Christ. Do not heed the messages that spew of pride, hate and hurt from the mouths of the ‘so-called’ wise (Tom, Delila ,Mark C., and Vern to name a few). But rather in fullness of faith and with the help of the Holy Spirit be led in strength not looking back to the pillars of sand that lie in the past. Enter into the land that was promised you. Dear Sarahhoffee, I do not know much about Delilah, but I consider it an honor to be included on your list of bad guys with Mark C. and Verne. If being associated with such men is my worst failing...I'll count myself blessed. However, it would be nice to know exactly what I am accused of, other than vague accusations about "spewing out hate and hurt". Would you be so kind as to try to be specific? Perhaps you could make a brief list of my transgressions? I must confess I find your long treatise somewhat vague. In fact, I can't understand it at all! Perhaps, I am like the Ninevite "dumbies". Most theologians think that this refers to children, not stupid people. But then, I do not claim special enlightment from God. God bless, Thomas Maddux I don't know much about Thomas Maddux, but I don't mind being included in front of the firing squad with him. Cheers Tom! delila : Re:George is Innocent : delila March 07, 2004, 06:56:32 AM My dear friend Kimberly,
I've finally figured out how to edit my bloopers. Not that I'm going to now go through every post and do that, but I'm fixing this one: Kimberly, if this helps, I'm glad. If not, that's okay too. Here it is: Anything that comes off the 'soaring' site can be dealt with in a manner that disturbs not our own blood pressure. Here's how, and you'll have to use a bit of imagination here. It involves some visualization and such, and I know that such terms bother many. So I'll use a simple comparison: spews from the soaring site are very much the same as the sound that might come from a room full of popcorn farts. The effect is also similar, but the meaning, well... that's similar too. I apologize for the the vulgar comparison... no, I don't. 'nough said. drj : FAKE POSTER ALERT : Andrea Denner March 07, 2004, 09:38:17 AM My opinion is that areyougettingit is a fake poster. Fake posters have a certain bent to them. Just a little too far over the edge, and of course will not identify themselves.
Just a word from someone who has been right about all of the other fake posters. Andrea Denner I still don't like fake posters!!! : Re:George is Innocent : areyougettingit March 07, 2004, 01:38:32 PM Everyone out there, are we ready to take the next step or you guys are going to concentrate on figuring out who this mysteriuos poster is? One thing is for sure, I am not fake. And perhaps one day you will be thankful that I came along. Take my advice do not waste your time figuring out who I am. Should you decide to keep guessing go ahead. I keep entertaining myself with it.
For those who are wishing to brainstorm with me feel free to express your ideas on the BB or send me a quick note. For example we need to know how many of us are having inside knowledge of legal processes. How many of us are able to and willing to dig into cases that were filed based on similar cult issues. We need to research the best attorney in town to help us win the case. Let's not waste more time, we have to act asap especially before regrouping. Remember, the key is to stay focused on accomplishing the agenda. Once again my question is: WHAT IS OUR AGENDA? WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH HERE? areyougettingit? : Re:George is Innocent : delila March 07, 2004, 05:23:36 PM I find it hard to reason with a clown in a mask.
drj : Re:George is Innocent : Kimberley Tobin March 08, 2004, 12:01:23 AM Areyougettingit?
I don't know, are you getting it? Why would we divulge to someone who will not acknowledge themselves, a plan, agenda, etc. (if we had one, I'm not saying anyone here DOES)? ::) You have got to be kidding? While what you say may have some merit, ie, I wouldn't mind some of these leaders being prosecuted, etc., however, do you really think we would discuss this with someone who chooses to remain anonymous? What turnip truck do you think we fell off of? It is almost humerous. Really, I could care less who you are. But if you want to remain anonymous, I would suggest you stop asking publicly what people's plans are. You are laughable! : Re:George is Innocent : editor March 08, 2004, 01:11:40 AM Areyougettingit? I don't know, are you getting it? Why would we divulge to someone who will not acknowledge themselves, a plan, agenda, etc. (if we had one, I'm not saying anyone here DOES)? ::) You have got to be kidding? While what you say may have some merit, ie, I wouldn't mind some of these leaders being prosecuted, etc., however, do you really think we would discuss this with someone who chooses to remain anonymous? What turnip truck do you think we fell off of? It is almost humerous. Really, I could care less who you are. But if you want to remain anonymous, I would suggest you stop asking publicly what people's plans are. You are laughable! You've never met me, and you don't know who I am, but I have two million dollars that I need to deposit in a US back account, and your name was given to me as a person with business integrity. I need you to open an account with 1000.00 in it, then I will deposit 2,000,000.00 into it. After ten days, I will withdraw 900,000.00 and you can keep the rest for your trouble. Please give me the account number, routing number, and SWIFT code as soon as you open the account. Don't worry about my name.....just think of the money. Any takers? Brent : Re:George is Innocent : editor March 08, 2004, 01:54:14 AM http://www.soaringwiththeeagles.com/yabbse/index.php?board=6;action=display;threadid=159;start=0#msg533 (http://www.soaringwiththeeagles.com/yabbse/index.php?board=6;action=display;threadid=159;start=0#msg533)
You just don't know when to stop, do you? At this point I still have to be a little vague, but soon I will be able to say more. I spoke with one or more people, one of which is a professor at a law school. There are signed, detailed, explicit, x-rated statements signed by the women, in possesion of a person, whose name we all know. I was assured by one or more people, one of whom is a professor at a law school, that not only are the charges true, and heinous, but that if George decided to sue me for libel, he would lose because at least one of the women would testify in person. The signed statements could also come into play. What I really want is a brief statement by one of the Fullerton leaders who spoke with the women, and I am working on that. However, in the mean time, I have satisfied myself that the charges are true---I knew it all along---and that at least one of the women would speak if necessary. In poker you can do one of 5 things with your cards: Check Call Bet Raise Fold You fold when you know you have lost, and don't want to lose yet more money. You check if you need more cards to make your hand, and you hope to get them for free, or at least for cheap. You can also check if you know you have the winning hand, and that your opponent thinks he has the winning hand, in order to induce a bet from them, in which case you check-raise. (you have four 2's, and they have Aces full of twos.) This is called sandbagging, or slowplaying, and it is a way to milk money from your opponents without scarring them away. You call if you want to see the next card, or you want to see their cards, but don't want to spend any more money by betting or raising. Calling is appropriate when you don't have much confidence and want to pick off a bluff. Betting is done to: get more money in the pot drive people out of the hand bluff gain information Usually, betting involves more than one of the above. Raising means betting more money after someone else has bet. Raising is done to: get more money in the pot when you know you have the best hand pick off a bluffer Get people to check to you in a later round, thus getting a more expensive card for free. Bluffing. I didn't fold. I didn't bluff What I did was check raise/sandbag. I knew all along that the charges were true...but I didn't have the confidence that they could be substantiated due to the reluctance of the "women." Now I know different. I also knew that Matt was bluffing when he said, "Brent could have made it all up." I did no such thing, and had he read about the events on January 18th, 2003, he would have known that the excommunication of George was a seperate event that took place in Fullerton entirely without my input. Not only did I not make it up, I had little to do with it. Similarly to when you accused me of stealing money from a collection for Judy, you have suggested that I made up the Adultery stuff. You came out betting on this post, but it is a bluff. I know the names, and I know I can count on the truth being told if needed. I have also been assured that there is no possible way George could bring a lawsuit against me on this matter because it would destroy him, utterly. So, I sandbagged, you bluffed, I raised, you called......and I won. I also knew that in doing so I would flush out some other things that were going on, which I did. George is guilty. Period. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I know this is going to anger you, but Matt's post in which he suggests that I made this all up is right up there with inventing a collection for Judy and me skimming 15 grand off the top! It never happened, and you were shown to have been entirely wrong on every count. I called your bluff then, and won. Same as this time. It really happened, and the suggestion that it didn't is reasonable, in light of the silence. However, to say that I made it up is totally unreasonable, which is why I did what I did. I was really enjoying our discussion on Deeper Life stuff, and I am willing to go back to that under the sole condition that you do not delete this post. I am anwering your questions here, and to delete it would be quite dishonest. Brent : Re:George is Innocent : Kimberley Tobin March 08, 2004, 02:15:25 AM Hey Brent:
I know you need to reference that OTHER BB (can I vomit?) :P but I can no longer go there. They make me absolutely SICK! I will not even respond to their IGNORANT posts with a diginified response. When you reference it in the future, I will just have to have my curiousity unsatisfied as to the exact nature of your post, as their mindset is so ASSEMBLY and they won't even acknowledge it. It makes one CRAZY to even dialogue with these individuals. I want nothing to do with them any further, just as I don't want to have anything to do with the leadership from the assembly any longer. |