AssemblyBoard
November 24, 2024, 11:18:20 am *
The board has been closed to new content. It is available as a searchable archive only. This information will remain available indefinitely.

I can be reached at brian@tucker.name

For a repository of informational articles and current information on The Assembly, see http://www.geftakysassembly.com
 
   Home   Search  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: White Horse vs  (Read 4303 times)
David Mauldin
Guest
« on: April 23, 2003, 10:54:28 pm »

While living with a group of Christians in La Mirada, 96-98, my roommate became involved with a Reformed Church in Placentia (Micheal Horton?)and he listened to "White Horse Inn"  Although he never gave me the attitude of superiorty others from his church did.  They seemed to feel that I was off the mark somehow?  Would anyone else like to comment?
Logged
Mark C.
Guest


Email
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2003, 01:20:22 am »

Hi David Smiley
  I can not comment directly re. the attitude of the individuals you described because I don't know them. To have a concern re. what an individual believes is not necessarily a bad thing, if that is what you mean by asking your question.
  I have a concern for those who, due to their Assembly involvement, have rejected the Biblical faith.  My motives for this concern are based on the exclusive nature of the Christian faith.  To believe, for instance, that there is only one way to Heaven through Christ, is not a message of intolerance, but a necessary distinction in keeping with my faith.
  That you ask the question is a very good sign, as it means that you are troubled by it.  Your doubts re. exclusivity were earned by your suffering under an system of elitism that excluded others on the basis of membership and loyalty to a group.  It is only normal that you would be sensitive to those who claim "to have the one true vision/church", but then how can we ever be sure of anything again?!
  The disciples asked Jesus if they should forbid those not "with them" from using Jesus name to do His work.  We all know Jesus answer was to reject this kind of exclusivity based on group membership.  The important distinctions were those based on faith in Jesus and the fact that they were able to cast out demons shows that it was effective faith.
  Jesus taught an exlusive faith, but understood human fraility in understanding and believing the one true way.  With the Samaritan Woman Jesus told her that,"salvation was of the Jews" and that her doctrinal understanding was in error, but still proceeded to meet her in a personal and powerful way to communicate salvation to her.  What this demonstrates is that faith does not come by deciding what belief system is most accurate, but by a personal encounter with Christ(the word is near us).  Many Jews of the time were involved in God's "true" religous system and yet rejected Christ.
  To come to salvation is not to overcome all one's doubts and objections to the Gospel, but to bring one's troubled heart to the Great Physcian.  I still have many questions re. the seeming contradiction of God's love and those eternally lost, and yet my faith is not based on my ability to rationalize this seeming contradiction.  The supreme revelation of God's love in Christ on the cross tells me He is just and understands things in a way that I just can't comprehend.  
  Salvation is between God and an individual and is the work of God in that soul.  We Christians often do more harm than good in our sincere efforts to understand and communicate the Gospel.  Our best efforts are when we send the needy soul to God, where the heart's needs are met.  We need not sacrafice the true distinctions of the Gospel but with that understanding realize it is God that sets our feet on that path.
  May God richly bless you David as you continue to seek answers to the needs of your heart.
                                                    Mark  
Logged
outdeep
Guest


Email
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2003, 08:23:09 pm »

I've seen (and read) Reformed Theologians as well as Dispensational Theologians who fight like children and conduct themselves with smug arrogance.

On the other hand, I have read those in both camps who present their arguments well and are gracious to those with differing views.

Not sure we can make any kind of generalization.  I tend to set the former camp aside and learn what I can from the latter.

-Dave
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!