AssemblyBoard
November 27, 2024, 05:30:41 am *
The board has been closed to new content. It is available as a searchable archive only. This information will remain available indefinitely.

I can be reached at brian@tucker.name

For a repository of informational articles and current information on The Assembly, see http://www.geftakysassembly.com
 
   Home   Search  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Dietrick Bonhoeffer  (Read 8219 times)
David Mauldin
Guest
« on: July 07, 2004, 09:47:35 am »

Detrick Bonhoeffer is the subject of much debate amongst Unitarians.
While Detrick was a leader in the confessing Lutheren Church he may have seemed "confused" as to his beliefs.  For example at the beginning of the Nazi government he strictly adheared to the teaching of Christ concerning pacifism.  He boldly taught that Christians should not go to war!  (at least in the causes of his government.(Germany) )Mathew 5  "...if a man strike you on the cheek offer him the other..."  Yet it seems that Detrick began to doubt that this teaching applied to the present situation and he himself "Took up arms!" and conspired to assassinate Hitler on a number of occasions.  Sadly?  They all failed. Detrick was captured and put into prison where he was eventually hanged for his "crimes?" Did he regret his change of opinions?  Evidence seems to say no.. He died believing  he did the right thing and for him it was the "Will f God."  What do you think?  I promise this is my final post!!!!    
« Last Edit: July 07, 2004, 09:50:49 am by David Mauldin » Logged
outdeep
Guest


Email
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2004, 05:29:29 pm »

I honestly don't know.  I only read "Life Together" with Betty's spin so I don't know much about him.

No need to promise that this is your last post.  No one is running you out of town are they?
Logged
Arthur
Guest
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2004, 08:02:55 pm »

The fact that he is the subject of debate amongst Unitarians means little since they stand for little and wouldn't understand a man like Bonhoeffer.

I wonder why you bring him up, seeing as how you do not believe in what he does and are so confused as to even question if Hitler's death would be a sad thing or not.

But in answer to your question, here are his words with explanation taken from http://www.gospelcom.net/chi/GLIMPSEF/Glimpses/glmps063.shtml


His participation in the murder plot obviously conflicts with Bonhoeffer's position as a pacifist. His sister-in-law, Emmi Bonhoeffer, cited his reasoning. He told her: "If I see a madman driving a car into a group of innocent bystanders, then I can't, as a Christian, simply wait for the catastrophe and then comfort the wounded and bury the dead. I must try to wrestle the steering wheel out of the hands of the driver."

Interestingly, Bonhoeffer had safely escaped the troubles in Europe and gone to teach in New York in June, 1939. He abruptly returned less than a month later saying: "I have had time to think and to pray about my situation, and that of my nation, and to have God's will for me clarified. I have come to the conclusion that I have made a mistake in coming to America. I shall have no right to participate in the reconstruction of the Christian life in Germany after the war if I did not share in the trials of this time with my people. Christians in Germany face the terrible alternative of willing the defeat of their nation in order that civilization may survive, or willing the victory of their nation and thereby destroying civilization. I know which of these alternatives I must choose. But I cannot make that choice in security."

Bonhoeffer, even while in prison, maintained his pastoral role. Those who were with him spoke of the guidance and spiritual inspiration he gave not only to fellow inmates but to prison guards as well.

In a letter smuggled out of prison Bonhoeffer showed no bitterness but rather explained how, "We in the resistance have learned to see the great events of world history from below, from the perspective of the excluded, the ill treated, the powerless, the oppressed and despised... so that personal suffering has become a more useful key for understanding the world than personal happiness."

Logged
David Mauldin
Guest
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2004, 07:59:56 am »

Lenore why this is my last post.  I have tried to have objective meaningful discisions on this B.B.  Yet what happens is the topic I begin with gets pushed aside and my personal beliefs are attacked. Remeber I just asked people to watch Fahrenhiet 9/11 and I get condesended to in a very disrespectful manner.  (Just look at what Tom said about my religion in the previous post!) I expect that Christians hold to a higher standard then that of name calling or an attacks on my character. Because I am not a Christian I have no moral basis!?  This must also apply to people like Ghandi? What happens is my emotions  get involved and I start doing the same. This I know will only end up in me being delited. So I will leave it at that. Oh by the way a person of whom will remain nameless told me that they did see the movie and that they are voting for Kerry.   Grin Grin
« Last Edit: July 08, 2004, 08:01:51 am by David Mauldin » Logged
al Hartman
Guest


Email
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2004, 09:47:32 am »



    ...why this is my last post.  I have tried to have objective meaningful discisions on this B.B.  Yet what happens is the topic I begin with gets pushed aside and my personal beliefs are attacked. Remeber I just asked people to watch Fahrenhiet 9/11 and I get condesended to in a very disrespectful manner.  (Just look at what Tom said about my religion in the previous post!) I expect that Christians hold to a higher standard then that of name calling or an attacks on my character. Because I am not a Christian I have no moral basis!?  This must also apply to people like Ghandi? What happens is my emotions  get involved and I start doing the same. This I know will only end up in me being delited. So I will leave it at that...


                                 Maudlin, Mauldin... Roll Eyes

     al  Wink


Logged
outdeep
Guest


Email
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2004, 09:58:43 am »

Lenore why this is my last post.  I have tried to have objective meaningful discisions on this B.B.  Yet what happens is the topic I begin with gets pushed aside and my personal beliefs are attacked. Remeber I just asked people to watch Fahrenhiet 9/11 and I get condesended to in a very disrespectful manner.  (Just look at what Tom said about my religion in the previous post!) I expect that Christians hold to a higher standard then that of name calling or an attacks on my character. Because I am not a Christian I have no moral basis!?  This must also apply to people like Ghandi? What happens is my emotions  get involved and I start doing the same. This I know will only end up in me being delited. So I will leave it at that. Oh by the way a person of whom will remain nameless told me that they did see the movie and that they are voting for Kerry.   Grin Grin
David,

The argument is not that atheists do not have morals - of course all people have a moral system.  What is in question is the basis of that morality.  If one believes in intelligent design, one believes in a Person who transcends the creation.  This Person has a right to set the rules.  As a result, dictates such as "you shall not commit premeditative murder" and "you shall not sleep with someone who is not your wife" are seen as absolute truths that transcend time and culture.

If one does not believe in God, then the matter about us is all that there is.  There is nothing that rises above the pack to set the moral rules.  Therefore, moral rules are set by 1) pragmatism (e.g., "I don't kill others because I don't want them to kill me, but I might kill the vulnerable of society if I see it solving other problems such as population growth")  2) likes and dislikes (e. g., "I don't like Hitler, Saddam, and Bush, therefore they are evil.")  3) Moral truths that one picks up from the Judeo-Christian ethic that has permeated our society even though the religions themselves are rejected. (e.g., "I believe that lying is wrong because I grew up believing that.")  

This may feel to you as an attack, but it is a standard apologetic argument.  You will find it in Ravi Zacharias' Can Man Live Without God? and Dennis Prager's Ten questions about Judaism as well as just about any other apologetic work you might read.

The question is, is it true?  Or what is the basis upon which an atheist’s morals rest?  What makes a man good and what makes a man bad and does it really matter?  And why does it matter?

-Dave
Logged
M2
Guest
« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2004, 10:43:33 am »

Correct me if I am wrong David M.  You have become a left-wing liberal thinker ex-christian primarily because of your assembly experience and various confrontations with George Geftakys.

I was not one of those who was left because I got weary with the regime, or because I was pushed out of fellowship, or because I could not see eye to eye with a LB/LBW, or whatever other reason.  I am guilty of all three mentioned, though I did not leave for any of those reasons.  When I left I was clear in my mind that the assembly system was/is a false religious system.  But so many left for those other reasons and it has had a devasting effect on their faith such that it has given them a bad taste in their mouths to anything 'christian'.  I myself still struggle with activities that 'remind' me of the assembly.  Many who left prior to GG's excomm... felt like they had left the Lord just because they had left the 'one and true vision' of NT simplicity (according to Geftakys).

In your zeal to be liberal and accepting of all, you reject conservativism and christianity and thus fail in your objective to accept all.  Quite a dilemna.  You find every angle whereby you can 'contest' the christian way.  Deitrich Bonhoeffer was a man who wanted to do the right thing IMO.  What matters is what would Jesus do in that scenario?  He did turn over the money tables in His zeal for His Father's house.  He did rebuke the false religious system of His day.  So would He have been involved in a plot to asassinate Hitler?  Good question.

Ghandi rejected Chrisitanity because of prejudicial treatment from those who called themselves Christians.  Unfortunate but true.  Christians are not always Christlike.  However, the scribes and Pharisees rejected Christ as their Messiah and they met the Man.  What makes the difference?  I suggest that even the pharisee recognizes the truth of Who Christ is when he (the pharisee) lays aside his preconceived notions and is willing to honestly inquire of the Lord.  Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea were two such pharisees.

Anyway, Lord bless,
Marcia Marinier
Logged
David Mauldin
Guest
« Reply #7 on: July 10, 2004, 10:02:55 am »

Marcia I would love to chat with you privately but you havn't posted your E-Mail.  Please feel free to E-mail me and I would love to tellyou why I can no longer accept the idea of a personal loving God.
Logged
al Hartman
Guest


Email
« Reply #8 on: July 10, 2004, 10:47:26 pm »



Marcia I would love to chat with you privately but you havn't posted your E-Mail.  Please feel free to E-mail me and I would love to tellyou why I can no longer accept the idea of a personal loving God.

     Before someone well-intentioned but ill-advisedly takes David to task for not posting the opinion he proposes to discuss privately with Marcia, let me say that I think he has made a wise and responsible decision in this, and that he has done it for the best and most valid of reasons.  Anyone who disagrees, please contact me personally, and I'll be glad to discuss the matter with you.

     Thanks, David and, again, my best hopes and wishes accompany my prayers for you.

al


Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!