Hi All!
I'm back from my weary travels for the week and really enjoyed reading this thread. I wish I could respond to all the thoughts raised here, as understanding what we have in the Gospel is the key to healing and strength for our souls.
The truth of the Grace of God is worth an investment of study in order to gain all the clarity we can get in our thinking. This is why I, and others here, make a big deal about making sure we don't get off the track.
It is not an error of pride to be confident re. a clear understanding of this teaching. Noble Bereans searched the scriptures to see if Paul's teaching was true, which means it is possible to verify. Jack, Verne, Joe, and others have given great examples and testimony to the above discovery of the riches of grace.
Jack: the book by Chafer is the same as you mention in your post. He wrote it long before 1965 and so it must be a reprint. Another good book (from a Reformed position) was one that Steve Irons gave me called, "A theology of the Holy Spirit", by Frederick Dale Bruner, Published by Eerdmans.
Re. understanding the parables in the Gospels: The book oft recommended here, "How to Read The Bible For All It's Worth" will give some help with this. The key re. parables is to understand that the parable was designed to make just one main point. To try and decide what the hidden meaning behind all the details can make for some erroneous and humorous conclusions. For example, Jesus uses the "Mustard Tree" example in one parable as something bad, and in another as something good. Some have tried to give a universal interpretation of the meaning of the metaphor "The Mustard Tree" as a reference to worldly and demon possessed churches! Yet, Jesus wishes we had the faith of a Mustard Tree in one passage and in another the tree is a metaphor for a dwelling place for fowls of the air?!
I had the same problem as others with the book of Hebrews. GG really had the definitions turned around which caused us to view it incorrectly. Let's face it, the book was written to "Hebrews" who were in danger of returning to pre-Christian Judiasm. The book most certainly was trying to define New Test. vs. Old Test. , and not overcomer vs. carnal Christians. In I JN we're told that those that
believe in Christ
have overcome! (Arthur pointed this emphasis on the word, "believe" in his quotes of Heb.)
Thanks again to all those who have posted on this topic.
God Bless, Mark