Hi, gang, especially Brad,
Here is what I have OBSERVED (no judgement): 1: The very fact that there are Assembly Kids in their late teens to early 20's is significantly different from what we are used to seeing.
Of approximately 75 Assembly Kids from Tuscola, Champaign and Springfield from the late 70's to late 80's APPROXIMATELY 70 of them left fellowship and never looked back. No numbers, but the vast majority of the 70 were so turned off to the TRUTH about Jesus Christ that they are just now achieving a peace about about their theological heritage.
The fact that this next generation of Assembly Kids is still clinging to and defending the Assembly patterns means something is different. Is this significant?
2: This difference in their upbringing and their willingness to stay involved in the Assembly is NOT significant. How can I say that, you ask?
It only means that the LOCAL assemblies in this region have learned enough from their mistakes to loosen the reigns on their children enough that the children can say, after viewing some of the posts concerning the horrific abuses of Assembly leaders, "What? That's not the way it is! We never saw anything like that!"
The problem is they firmly believe that since they have not personally experienced the life altering spiritual abuse of the Assembly doctrine, that therefore it does not exist. Part of the problem is they cannot know if they have experienced spirtual abuse because they have no other experience on which to base their experience!
They have no understanding that there are inherent flaws in the doctrine of the Assembly, in the Assembly's patterns of worship or in the Assembly's leadership structure.
If anyone who reads this post takes any one thought out of it, please take this: The Assembly pattern/docrine is designed/pre-conceived/tailored so that one man or a small group of leaders can spirtually dominate large numbers of well-intentioned believers.
This domination can manifest itself in terrible abuses such as have been proven to occur in Fullerton and San Luis Obispo, OR it can be much more subtle, demanding labor for inheritance, legalism, causing humiliation, USURPING CHRIST"S AUTHORITY IN A MAN'S LIFE.
Some areas of a man's life where the authority of Christ can be usurped (i.e. the freedom of life in Christ paid for by His blood): How often he should attend meetings, what his contribution should be when attending meetings, what personal standards are kept in his home in regards to dress (levels of modesty for his wife and children), what television shows (i.e. entertainment) are appropriate for his family, what foods he should eat, where he should work, how he should FEEL about other believers, how he should FEEL (not think or believe) about other doctrines, what hymns should be sing, how should he couch the phrases of his prayers, how many questions and of what nature should be put to the appointed leadership in his local gathering, what time should he awake in the morning so that he has an "appropriate" amount of time to spend on his knees, etc.
This list is literally endless as the choices that are given to a man are endless and freely given to him by Christ.
Do not take this to mean that there is no accountability. Do not take this to mean that Godly leaders have nothing to offer or do not have a responsibility to correct or teach or counsel or even discipline.
However, the patterns and doctrine of the Assembly allow, even cause, even encourage, even require, that its leadership go a step beyond and usurp the authority and freedom of Christ in a man's life.
I'm tired. I'm done for now.
Please feel free to correct my doctrinal flaws! I'll listen.
Scott