Peacefulg
Guest
|
 |
« on: February 20, 2004, 09:55:30 pm » |
|
Just wanted to know what blogs people read and why. Been reading quite a few for almost two years now (started with homeschooling stuff and branched out from there).
Cheers,
G
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
outdeep
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2004, 11:39:23 pm » |
|
www.worldmagblog.com - I think very highly of World magazine and the job they do with the news. www.scrappleface.com - Great satire. www.blogs4god.com is a directory of Christian blogs.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 20, 2004, 11:40:06 pm by Dave Sable »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peacefulg
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2004, 07:57:53 pm » |
|
Dave, I do read worldmag blog, the whole gay discussion gone on in different sections is very interesting, especially considering you have "possible" un-saved people who regularly pipe in. BTW, I miss that racist Bad alwaying piping in with thoughts, but I go to his blog to get the latest "southern" views. Lucus, thanks for yours they connect with my inner geekness. BTW; have you taken this test, and what was your score? http://www.innergeek.us/geek.html Some of the blogs I look at! http://icky.blogspot.com/ Izzy keeps the homeschoolers up todate. http://www.dyingchurch.com/ The Dying Church - good stuff about how pomo churches have taken over, and how to get back to a chruch that is alive. http://www.acidink.org/ Makes you think and ponder, note: has a calvinist slant though. Cheers, G |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jesusfreak
Guest
|
|
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2004, 02:24:06 am » |
|
Bah, I got "48.91519% - Super Geek"  -- lucas |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Scott McCumber
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2004, 02:40:53 am » |
|
Bah, I got "48.91519% - Super Geek" -- lucas You should get another Geek point for carrying the decimal out that far!  I was 28.9% - Total Geek. I'm not a big computer geek and that held me back. Thankfully!  S |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peacefulg
Guest
|
|
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2004, 02:45:32 am » |
|
I had a 36.7 when I took the test. Dang, should have done more D&D back in the days could have hit the 40%.
Later,
G
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rachel
Guest
|
|
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2004, 03:00:16 am » |
|
27.8%. Wasn't into enought Sci-fi as a kid.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sfortescue
Guest
|
|
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2004, 05:22:21 am » |
|
I got about 25%. Not enough questions relevant to older people.
Before looking at that web site, I had run Luke's score through the continued fraction algorithm and found that 0.4891519 is about 248/507. I wondered about the big numbers, but at the end of the test it said that there were 507 questions: a lot more than I had expected.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Scott McCumber
Guest
|
|
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2004, 05:33:03 am » |
|
I got about 25%. Not enough questions relevant to older people.
Before looking at that web site, I had run Luke's score through the continued fraction algorithm and found that 0.4891519 is about 248/507. I wondered about the big numbers, but at the end of the test it said that there were 507 questions: a lot more than I had expected.
Hey, Stephen, I agree. Nearly all of the questions I answered positively had more to do with my youth than anything currently. Lots of D&D, comics and sci-fi/fantasy. Do I get a point for thinking your continued fraction algorithm is cool?  S |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jesusfreak
Guest
|
|
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2004, 06:17:39 am » |
|
I got about 25%. Not enough questions relevant to older people.
Before looking at that web site, I had run Luke's score through the continued fraction algorithm and found that 0.4891519 is about 248/507. I wondered about the big numbers, but at the end of the test it said that there were 507 questions: a lot more than I had expected.
Hey, Stephen, I agree. Nearly all of the questions I answered positively had more to do with my youth than anything currently. Lots of D&D, comics and sci-fi/fantasy. Do I get a point for thinking your continued fraction algorithm is cool? S Sure, but i get to call you a dork ps Steve - I finally get what you were telling me regarding the fractional series of the "amount of mountain dew it would take to kill you" thing awhile back. I didn't understand what you were trying to tell me  -- lucas |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Scott McCumber
Guest
|
|
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2004, 06:30:08 am » |
|
Sure, but i get to call you a dork -- lucas Hey, I don't have to take that from you, Super Geek. There are hundreds of other people willing to call me a dork! S |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sfortescue
Guest
|
|
« Reply #12 on: February 25, 2004, 07:19:33 am » |
|
ps Steve - I finally get what you were telling me regarding the fractional series of the "amount of mountain dew it would take to kill you" thing a while back. I didn't understand what you were trying to tell me The thing I hadn't realized back then was that the number I was analyzing had come from the source code of the web page rather than from use of the web page. The number must have been from dividing the deadly caffeine dose by the amount in a can. I haven't been able to find info on either of those numbers yet, but I haven't tried all that hard either. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peacefulg
Guest
|
|
« Reply #13 on: February 25, 2004, 07:53:29 am » |
|
Wait one second, is number your using from Code Red Mtn Dew, Regular Mtn Dew, or Diet Dew? Cheers, G |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jesusfreak
Guest
|
|
« Reply #14 on: February 27, 2004, 08:56:19 am » |
|
Wait one second, is number your using from Code Red Mtn Dew, Regular Mtn Dew, or Diet Dew? Cheers, G Most definitely from Regular. However, Code Red has plenty more lethal elements to choose from -- lucas |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
